Suppr超能文献

欧洲椋鸟繁殖性能的生理预测指标()。

Physiological predictors of reproductive performance in the European Starling ().

作者信息

Fowler Melinda A, Paquet Mélissa, Legault Véronique, Cohen Alan A, Williams Tony D

机构信息

1Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Canada.

Present address: Springfield College Biology, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109-3797 USA.

出版信息

Front Zool. 2018 Nov 22;15:45. doi: 10.1186/s12983-018-0288-3. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is widely assumed that variation in fitness components has a physiological basis that might underlie selection on trade-offs, but the mechanisms driving decreased survival and future fecundity remain elusive. Here, we assessed whether physiological variables are related to workload ability or immediate fitness consequences and if they mediate future survival or reproductive success. We used data on 13 physiological variables measured in 93 female European starlings () at two breeding stages (incubation, chick-rearing), for first-and second-broods over two years (152 observations).

RESULTS

There was little co-variation among the physiological variables, either in incubating or chick-rearing birds, but some systematic physiological differences between the two stages. Chick-rearing birds had lower hematocrit and plasma creatine kinase but higher hemoglobin, triglyceride and uric acid levels. Only plasma corticosterone was repeatable between incubation and chick-rearing. We assessed relationships between incubation or chick-rearing physiology and measures of workload, current productivity, future fecundity or survival in a univariate manner, and found very few significant relationships. Thus, we next explored the utility of multivariate analysis (principal components analysis, Mahalanobis distance) to account for potentially complex physiological integration, but still found no clear associations.

CONCLUSIONS

This implies either that a) birds maintained physiological variables within a homeostatic range that did not affect their performance, b) there are relatively few links between physiology and performance, or, more likely, c) that the complexity of these relationships exceeds our ability to measure it. Variability in ecological context may complicate the relationship between physiology and behavior. We thus urge caution regarding the over-interpretation of isolated significant findings, based on single traits in single years, in the literature.

摘要

背景

人们普遍认为,适应性组成部分的变化具有生理基础,这可能是权衡选择的基础,但导致生存和未来繁殖力下降的机制仍然难以捉摸。在这里,我们评估了生理变量是否与工作负荷能力或直接的适应性后果相关,以及它们是否介导未来的生存或繁殖成功。我们使用了在两个繁殖阶段(孵化期、育雏期)对93只欧洲椋鸟()测量的13个生理变量的数据,这些数据涵盖了两年内的第一窝和第二窝(共152次观察)。

结果

无论是在孵化期还是育雏期的鸟类中,生理变量之间几乎没有协变,但两个阶段之间存在一些系统性的生理差异。育雏期的鸟类血细胞比容和血浆肌酸激酶较低,但血红蛋白、甘油三酯和尿酸水平较高。只有血浆皮质酮在孵化期和育雏期之间具有重复性。我们以单变量的方式评估了孵化期或育雏期生理与工作负荷、当前生产力、未来繁殖力或生存指标之间的关系,发现显著关系很少。因此,我们接下来探讨了多变量分析(主成分分析、马氏距离)在解释潜在复杂生理整合方面的效用,但仍然没有发现明确的关联。

结论

这意味着要么a)鸟类将生理变量维持在不影响其表现的稳态范围内,b)生理与表现之间的联系相对较少,或者更有可能的是c)这些关系的复杂性超出了我们测量的能力。生态环境的变异性可能会使生理与行为之间的关系复杂化。因此,我们敦促在文献中谨慎对待基于单一年份的单一性状对孤立的显著发现进行过度解读。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验