Pereira Diana R, Albuquerque Pedro B
Neuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, PT.
Human Cognition Lab, CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, PT.
Psychol Belg. 2018 Apr 27;58(1):91-104. doi: 10.5334/pb.387.
Self-report instruments that allow to characterize the frequency of daily memory failures are essential for a comprehensive assessment of memory functioning. In this context, we aimed to provide preliminary evidence of validity and reliability for the European Portuguese adaptation of the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). A total of 1052 healthy participants completed an online survey with the PRMQ. The exploration of the construct validity suggested the tripartite model with a general memory, a prospective memory, and a retrospective memory factors to have the best adjustment to the data. Measurement invariance across age and sex groups was also verified. The questionnaire revealed good convergent validity with a general self-report measure of memory (0.778 < < 0.853), and satisfactory values of internal consistency (0.779 < Cronbach's alpha < 0.887) and of test-retest reliability (0.815 < < 0.852). There were no prominent effects of sex and age in the PRMQ scores. Although the sample encompassed mainly younger and highly educated adults, this study presented the first evidence of validity and reliability for the European Portuguese version of the questionnaire.
能够描述日常记忆失误频率的自我报告工具对于全面评估记忆功能至关重要。在此背景下,我们旨在为前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ)的欧洲葡萄牙语改编版提供有效性和可靠性的初步证据。共有1052名健康参与者完成了一项使用PRMQ的在线调查。对结构效度的探索表明,具有一般记忆、前瞻性记忆和回顾性记忆因素的三方模型对数据的拟合最佳。还验证了年龄和性别组之间的测量不变性。该问卷显示出与一般记忆自我报告测量的良好收敛效度(0.778 << 0.853),以及令人满意的内部一致性值(0.779 <克朗巴哈系数 < 0.887)和重测信度值(0.815 << 0.852)。性别和年龄对PRMQ分数没有显著影响。尽管样本主要包括年轻且受过高等教育的成年人,但本研究为该问卷的欧洲葡萄牙语版本提供了有效性和可靠性的首个证据。