Carr Deborah, Luth Elizabeth A
Department of Sociology, Boston University, Massachusetts.
Department of Sociology, Rutgers University, New Jersey.
Innov Aging. 2017 Aug 28;1(1):igx012. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx012. eCollection 2017 Mar 1.
Advance care planning (ACP) is widely considered an essential step toward achieving end-of-life care that is consistent with the preferences of dying patients and their families. ACP comprises a living will and a durable power of attorney for health care (DPAHC); these tools enable patients to articulate and convey their treatment preferences when they are still cognitively intact. In this article, we describe the strengths, weaknesses, and correlates of ACP in the United States, with attention to race and socioeconomic disparities therein. We then discuss other public policies and community programs designed to increase both the number of older adults who articulate their preferences for end-of-life care, and efficacy of ACP for ensuring that patients' end-of-life treatment preferences are met. We describe the characteristics, strengths, and limitations of Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLSTs), and describe community programs, educational interventions, and public policies aimed toward increasing the prevalence and efficacy of end-of-life preparations. A key policy advance in the early 2010s has been Medicare coverage of one doctor-patient consultation session regarding end-of-life issues; we highlight the potentials and possible pitfalls of this policy. We conclude by identifying areas for future research, and highlighting practices from other nations that may help improve quality of end-of-life care in the United States.
预先护理计划(ACP)被广泛认为是实现与临终患者及其家属偏好相一致的临终护理的关键一步。ACP包括生前遗嘱和医疗保健持久授权书(DPAHC);这些工具使患者在认知功能尚健全时能够阐明并传达自己的治疗偏好。在本文中,我们描述了美国ACP的优势、劣势及其相关因素,特别关注其中的种族和社会经济差异。然后,我们讨论了其他旨在增加明确表达临终护理偏好的老年人数量以及提高ACP确保患者临终治疗偏好得到满足的有效性的公共政策和社区项目。我们描述了维持生命治疗医生医嘱(POLSTs)的特点、优势和局限性,并介绍了旨在提高临终准备普及率和有效性的社区项目、教育干预措施和公共政策。21世纪10年代初的一项关键政策进展是医疗保险覆盖一次关于临终问题的医患咨询;我们强调了这项政策的潜力和可能存在的问题。我们通过确定未来研究的领域并强调其他国家可能有助于提高美国临终护理质量的做法来得出结论。