Suppr超能文献

2018 - 2019年猝死风险分层:新旧情况

Sudden Death Risk-Stratification in 2018-2019: The Old and the New.

作者信息

Zaman Sarah, Goldberger Jeffrey J, Kovoor Pramesh

机构信息

Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; MonashHEART, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Jan;28(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.027. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

Abstract

Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is a major public health issue, accounting for half of all cardiovascular deaths world-wide. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been solidified as the cornerstone therapy in primary prevention of SCD in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. However, what has become increasingly clear is that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an inadequate tool to select patients for a prophylactic ICD, despite its widespread use for this purpose. Use of LVEF alone has poor specificity for arrhythmic versus non-arrhythmic death. In addition, the vast majority of sudden deaths occur in patients with more preserved cardiac function. Alternate predictors of sudden death include electrophysiology study, non-invasive markers of electrical instability, myocardial fibrosis, genetic and bio-markers. The challenge for the future is finding a risk stratification test, or combination of tests, that adequately select patients at high risk of SCD with low competing risk of non-sudden death.

摘要

心脏性猝死(SCD)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,占全球心血管疾病死亡人数的一半。植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)已被确立为缺血性和非缺血性心肌病患者SCD一级预防的基石疗法。然而,越来越明显的是,尽管左心室射血分数(LVEF)广泛用于此目的,但它作为选择预防性ICD患者的工具并不充分。单独使用LVEF对心律失常性死亡与非心律失常性死亡的特异性较差。此外,绝大多数猝死发生在心脏功能保存较好的患者中。猝死的其他预测指标包括电生理检查、电不稳定的非侵入性标志物、心肌纤维化、基因和生物标志物。未来的挑战是找到一种风险分层测试或测试组合,能够充分筛选出SCD高风险且非猝死竞争风险低的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验