Etiaba Enyi, Onwujekwe Obinna, Honda Ayako, Ibe Ogochukwu, Uzochukwu Benjamin, Hanson Kara
Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 25;3(5):e000917. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000917. eCollection 2018.
In an attempt to achieve universal health coverage, Nigeria introduced a number of health insurance schemes. One of them, the Formal Sector Social Health Insurance Programme (FSSHIP), was launched in 2005 to provide health cover to federal government and formal private sector employees. It operates with two levels of purchasers, the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and health maintenance organisations (HMOs). This study critically assesses purchasing arrangements between NHIS, HMOs and healthcare providers and determines how the arrangements function from a strategic purchasing perspective within the FSSHIP.
A qualitative study undertaken in Enugu state, Nigeria, data were gathered through reviews of documents, 17 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with NHIS, HMOs and healthcare providers and two focus group discussions (FGDs) with FSSHIP enrolees. A strategic purchasing lens was used to guide data analysis.
The purchasing function was not being used strategically to influence provider behaviour and improve efficiency and quality in healthcare service delivery. For the purchaser-provider relationship, these actions are: accreditation of healthcare providers; monitoring of HMOs and healthcare providers and use of appropriate provider payment mechanisms for healthcare services at every level. The government lacks resources and political will to perform their stewardship role while provider dissatisfaction with payments and reimbursements adversely affected service provision to enrolled members. Underlying this inability to purchase, health services strategically is the two-tiered purchasing mechanism wherein NHIS is not adequately exercising its stewardship role to monitor and guide HMOs to fulfil their roles and responsibilities as purchasing administrators.
Purchasing under the FSSHIP is more passive than strategic. Governance framework requires strengthening and clarity for optimal implementation so as to ensure that both levels of purchasers undertake strategic purchasing actions. Additional strengthening of NHIS is needed for it to have capacity to play its stewardship role in the FSSHIP.
为实现全民健康覆盖,尼日利亚推出了多项医疗保险计划。其中之一,正规部门社会医疗保险计划(FSSHIP)于2005年启动,旨在为联邦政府和正规私营部门员工提供医疗保险。该计划有两级采购方,即国家医疗保险计划(NHIS)和健康维护组织(HMOs)。本研究对NHIS、HMOs和医疗服务提供者之间的采购安排进行了批判性评估,并从战略采购角度确定了这些安排在FSSHIP中的运作方式。
在尼日利亚埃努古州进行了一项定性研究,通过审查文件、对NHIS、HMOs和医疗服务提供者进行17次深入访谈(IDI)以及与FSSHIP参保人进行两次焦点小组讨论(FGD)收集数据。采用战略采购视角指导数据分析。
采购功能未被战略性地用于影响提供者行为以及提高医疗服务提供中的效率和质量。对于采购方与提供者的关系,这些行动包括:医疗服务提供者的认证;对HMOs和医疗服务提供者的监督以及在各级医疗服务中使用适当的提供者支付机制。政府缺乏资源和政治意愿来履行其管理职责,而提供者对支付和报销的不满对参保成员的服务提供产生了不利影响。在无法进行战略采购的背后,是两级采购机制,其中NHIS没有充分发挥其管理作用来监督和指导HMOs履行其作为采购管理者的角色和职责。
FSSHIP下的采购更具被动性而非战略性。治理框架需要加强和明确,以实现最佳实施,从而确保两级采购方都能采取战略采购行动。需要进一步加强NHIS,使其有能力在FSSHIP中发挥其管理作用。