• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推动全民金融保护:签约信仰医疗机构以扩大获得服务的机会——来自马拉维的经验教训。

Promoting universal financial protection: contracting faith-based health facilities to expand access--lessons learned from Malawi.

机构信息

Community Health Department, College of Medicine, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Aug 19;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-27.

DOI:10.1186/1478-4505-11-27
PMID:23958156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751183/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public-private collaborations are increasingly being utilized to universalize health care. In Malawi, the Ministry of Health contracts selected health facilities owned by the main faith-based provider, the Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM), to deliver care at no fee to the most vulnerable and underserved populations in the country through Service Level Agreements (SLAs). This study examined the features of SLAs and their effectiveness in expanding universal coverage. The study involved a policy analysis focusing on key stakeholders around SLAs as well as a case study approach to analyse how design and implementation of SLAs affect efficiency, equity and sustainability of services delivered by SLAs.

METHODS

The study employed both qualitative and quantitative research methods to address the research questions and was conducted in five CHAM health facilities: Mulanje Mission, Holy Family, and Mtengowanthenga Hospitals, and Mabiri and Nkope Health Centres. National and district level decision makers were interviewed while providers and clients associated with the health facilities were surveyed on their experiences. A total of 155 clients from an expected 175 were recruited in the study.

RESULTS

The study findings revealed key aspects of how SLAs were operating, the extent to which their objectives were being attained and why. In general, the findings demonstrated that SLAs had the potential to improve health and universal health care coverage, particularly for the vulnerable and underserved populations. However, the findings show that the performance of SLAs in Malawi were affected by various factors including lack of clear guidelines, non-revised prices, late payment of bills, lack of transparency, poor communication, inadequate human and material resources, and lack of systems to monitor performance of SLAs, amongst others.

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong consensus and shared interest between the government and CHAM regarding SLAs. It was clear that free services provided by SLAs had a great impact on the impoverished locals that used the facilities. However, lack of supporting systems, inadequate infrastructure and shortage of health care providers affected SLA performance. The paper provides recommendations to policy makers for the replication and strengthening of SLA implementation in the roll-out of universalization policy.

摘要

背景

公私合作越来越多地被用于普及医疗保健。在马拉维,卫生部通过服务级别协议(SLA)将选定的由主要信仰提供者基督教健康协会(CHAM)拥有的卫生设施承包给该国最脆弱和服务不足的人群,为他们提供免费的医疗服务。本研究考察了 SLA 的特点及其在扩大全民覆盖方面的有效性。该研究涉及围绕 SLA 的主要利益相关者的政策分析,以及案例研究方法,以分析 SLA 的设计和实施如何影响 SLA 提供的服务的效率、公平性和可持续性。

方法

该研究采用定性和定量研究方法来解决研究问题,并在五个 CHAM 卫生设施进行:Mulanje 使命、Holy Family 和 Mtengowanthenga 医院,以及 Mabiri 和 Nkope 保健中心。对国家和地区级决策者进行了访谈,同时对与卫生设施相关的提供者和客户进行了调查,以了解他们的经验。在研究中,共招募了预计 175 名客户中的 155 名。

结果

研究结果揭示了 SLA 运作的关键方面、其目标实现的程度以及原因。总的来说,研究结果表明,SLA 有可能改善卫生和全民医疗保健覆盖范围,特别是对弱势群体和服务不足的人群。然而,研究结果表明,SLA 在马拉维的表现受到各种因素的影响,包括缺乏明确的指导方针、未修订的价格、账单支付延迟、缺乏透明度、沟通不畅、人力和物力资源不足、缺乏监测 SLA 绩效的系统等。

结论

政府和 CHAM 之间在 SLA 方面存在强烈的共识和共同利益。很明显,SLA 提供的免费服务对使用这些设施的贫困当地人产生了巨大影响。然而,缺乏支持系统、基础设施不足和医疗保健提供者短缺影响了 SLA 的表现。本文为政策制定者提供了建议,以复制和加强 SLA 的实施,在普及化政策的推出中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c066/3751183/9d0c51e8f9d2/1478-4505-11-27-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c066/3751183/25179ddfd353/1478-4505-11-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c066/3751183/9d0c51e8f9d2/1478-4505-11-27-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c066/3751183/25179ddfd353/1478-4505-11-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c066/3751183/9d0c51e8f9d2/1478-4505-11-27-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting universal financial protection: contracting faith-based health facilities to expand access--lessons learned from Malawi.推动全民金融保护:签约信仰医疗机构以扩大获得服务的机会——来自马拉维的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Aug 19;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-27.
2
The impact and cost-effectiveness of user fee exemption by contracting out essential health package services in Malawi.马拉维通过外包基本卫生套餐服务实施用户费用豁免的影响及成本效益
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 20;4(2):e001286. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001286. eCollection 2019.
3
The effect of user fee exemption on the utilization of maternal health care at mission health facilities in Malawi.免除用户费用对马拉维教会医疗机构孕产妇保健服务利用情况的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1184-92. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw050. Epub 2016 May 11.
4
Availability and affordability of antimalarial and antibiotic medicines in Malawi.马拉维抗疟药和抗生素药物的可及性与可负担性。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 18;12(4):e0175399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175399. eCollection 2017.
5
Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: a qualitative study in rural communities.马拉维全民健康覆盖的差距:农村社区的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 22;14:234. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-234.
6
Contracting-out primary health care services in Tanzania towards UHC: how policy processes and context influence policy design and implementation.坦桑尼亚将初级卫生保健服务外包以实现全民健康覆盖:政策过程和背景如何影响政策设计和实施。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Oct 5;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0835-8.
7
Challenges to effective governance in a low income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi.低收入医疗系统中有效治理面临的挑战:马拉维利益相关者认知的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x.
8
Contracting Out Non-State Providers to Provide Primary Healthcare Services in Tanzania: Perceptions of Stakeholders.坦桑尼亚将非国家提供者签约提供初级保健服务:利益攸关方的看法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):910-918. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.46.
9
Positioning the National Health Insurance for financial sustainability and Universal Health Coverage in Ghana: A qualitative study among key stakeholders.定位加纳国家健康保险以实现财务可持续性和全民健康覆盖:关键利益相关者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253109. eCollection 2021.
10
Can contracted out health facilities improve access, equity, and quality of maternal and newborn health services? Evidence from Pakistan.外包的医疗机构能否改善孕产妇和新生儿保健服务的可及性、公平性和质量?来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 25;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0041-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches, enablers and barriers to govern the private sector in health in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家治理私营部门参与卫生事务的方法、促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 13;8(Suppl 5):e015771. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015771.
2
Public-Private engagement and health systems resilience in times of health worker strikes: a Ghanaian case study.公共-私营部门合作与卫生工作者罢工时期的卫生系统韧性:加纳案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 May 15;39(5):469-485. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae018.
3
Do private health providers help achieve Universal Health Coverage? A scoping review of the evidence from low-income countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Constraints to implementing the Essential Health Package in Malawi.马拉维实施基本卫生包的制约因素。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020741. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
'Doing' health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges.进行健康政策分析:方法与概念的思考及挑战
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):308-17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn024.
3
Equity in health and healthcare in Malawi: analysis of trends.马拉维卫生与医疗保健的公平性:趋势分析
私立医疗服务提供者有助于实现全民健康覆盖吗?对低收入国家证据的范围界定审查。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Oct 11;38(9):1050-1063. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad075.
4
Decomposing socio-economic inequality in catastrophic out-of-pocket health expenditures in Malawi.剖析马拉维灾难性自付医疗支出中的社会经济不平等现象。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;2(2):e0000182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000182. eCollection 2022.
5
Spatial disparities in impoverishing effects of out-of-pocket health payments in Malawi. Malawi 中自付医疗费用致贫效应的空间差异。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2047465. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2047465.
6
How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis.马拉维的治疗服务和机构分娩的卫生支出公平吗?来自准纵向受益情况分析的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 18;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5.
7
Examining the incidence of catastrophic health expenditures and its determinants using multilevel logistic regression in Malawi.在马拉维使用多层次逻辑回归分析灾难性卫生支出的发生率及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248752. eCollection 2021.
8
Determinants of healthcare seeking and out-of-pocket expenditures in a "free" healthcare system: evidence from rural Malawi.“免费”医疗体系中就医行为和自付费用的决定因素:来自马拉维农村地区的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2020 May 27;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00271-2.
9
Payment Arrangements for Private Healthcare Purchasing Under Publicly Funded Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues and Implications.中低收入国家公共筹资体系下私人医疗保健购买的支付安排:问题与影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Dec;18(6):811-823. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00550-y.
10
What does the Malawi Demographic and Health Survey say about the country's first Health Sector Strategic Plan?马拉维人口与健康调查对该国首个卫生部门战略计划有何看法?
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010314. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010314.
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 15;7:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-78.
4
Contracting out health services in fragile states.在脆弱国家外包医疗服务。
BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):718-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.718.
5
Buying results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries.购买成果?发展中国家的卫生服务提供承包情况。
Lancet. 2005;366(9486):676-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67140-1.