Bedier Marwa M, Hashem Ahmed Abdel Rahman, Hassan Yosra M
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Nov 1;43(4):e46. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e46. eCollection 2018 Nov.
This study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of different instrumentation and irrigation techniques using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) after root canal inoculation with ().
Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of extracted mandibular molars were apically enlarged up to a size 25 hand K-file, then autoclaved and inoculated with . The samples were randomly divided into 4 main groups according to the system of instrumentation and irrigation: an XP-endo Shaper (XPS) combined with conventional irrigation (XPS/C) or an XP-endo Finisher (XPF) (XPS/XPF), and iRaCe combined with conventional irrigation (iRaCe/C) or combined with an XPF (iRaCe/XPF). A middle-third sample was taken from each group, and then the bacterial reduction was evaluated using CLSM at a depth of 50 µm inside the dentinal tubules. The ratio of red fluorescence (dead cells) to green-and-red fluorescence (live and dead cells) represented the percentage of bacterial reduction. The data were then statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons across the groups and the Dunn test was used for pairwise comparisons.
The instrumentation and irrigation techniques had a significant effect on bacterial reduction ( < 0.05). The iRaCe/XPF group showed the strongest effect, followed by the XPS/XPF and XPS/C group, while the iRaCe/C group had the weakest effect.
Combining iRaCe with XPF improved its bacterial reduction effect, while combining XPS with XPF did not yield a significant improvement in its ability to reduce bacteria at a depth of 50 µm in the dentinal tubules.
本研究旨在使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)评估在根管接种()后不同预备和冲洗技术的抗菌效果。
将拔除的下颌磨牙的近中颊根和近中舌根根尖扩大至25号手用K锉,然后高压灭菌并接种()。根据预备和冲洗系统将样本随机分为4个主要组:XP-endo Shaper(XPS)联合传统冲洗(XPS/C)或XP-endo Finisher(XPF)(XPS/XPF),以及iRaCe联合传统冲洗(iRaCe/C)或联合XPF(iRaCe/XPF)。从每组中取中间三分之一的样本,然后使用CLSM评估牙本质小管内50μm深度处的细菌减少情况。红色荧光(死菌)与绿色和红色荧光(活菌和死菌)的比例代表细菌减少的百分比。然后使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行统计学分析以比较各组,使用Dunn检验进行两两比较。
预备和冲洗技术对细菌减少有显著影响(<0.05)。iRaCe/XPF组效果最强,其次是XPS/XPF和XPS/C组,而iRaCe/C组效果最弱。
iRaCe与XPF联合可提高其抗菌效果,而XPS与XPF联合在牙本质小管内50μm深度处减少细菌的能力并未显著提高。