Suppr超能文献

息肉切除术后预防性夹子闭合术预防息肉切除术后延迟出血:一项系统评价

Postpolypectomy prophylactic clip closure for the prevention of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: A systematic review.

作者信息

Mangira Dileep, Ket Shara N, Majeed Ammar, Gibson Peter R, Brown Gregor

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology The Alfred Hospital and Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Department of Gastroenterology Western Health and Melbourne University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2018 Mar 25;2(3):105-110. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12047. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is the most common complication of colonoscopic polypectomy. Prophylactic clipping after an uncomplicated polypectomy is increasingly used, but it is unclear if this results in the prevention of DPPB. This study aimed to review prophylactic clip use and its effect on the rates of DPPB. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochran Library were systematically searched for studies (1995-March 2017) that used prophylactic hemoclips and assessed DPPB as an outcome. Of 1402 articles identified, nine papers were eligible for inclusion, evaluating 4311 patients and 7783 polyps; 118 patients experienced a DPPB, and 49 of these patients received prophylactic clips. There was no significant difference in DPPB rates in patients who received prophylactic clipping compared to those who did not (odd ratio: 0.8; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-1.77; = 0.56). There was also no significant difference in the DPPB of polyps <20 mm compared with polyps ≥20 mm. Clip application for prophylactic management of an uncomplicated polypectomy has not been demonstrated to reduce the risk of DPPB, casting doubt on the use of this costly practice.

摘要

息肉切除术后延迟出血(DPPB)是结肠镜息肉切除术最常见的并发症。单纯息肉切除术后预防性夹闭的应用越来越广泛,但尚不清楚这是否能预防DPPB。本研究旨在回顾预防性夹闭的使用情况及其对DPPB发生率的影响。系统检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中使用预防性血管夹并将DPPB作为观察指标的研究(1995年至2017年3月)。在检索到的1402篇文章中,9篇符合纳入标准,评估了4311例患者和7783枚息肉;118例患者发生了DPPB,其中49例接受了预防性夹闭。与未接受预防性夹闭的患者相比,接受预防性夹闭的患者DPPB发生率无显著差异(比值比:0.8;95%置信区间:0.36 - 1.77;P = 0.56)。直径<20 mm的息肉与直径≥20 mm的息肉的DPPB发生率也无显著差异。单纯息肉切除术后预防性夹闭并未被证明能降低DPPB的风险,这使得这种成本高昂的做法受到质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c287/6206987/f94d802647dd/JGH3-2-105-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验