Suppr超能文献

预防性钛夹放置在预防大肠大息肉切除术后延迟出血中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Role of prophylactic hemoclip placement in prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding for large colon polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Gangwani Manesh Kumar, Ahuja Priyanka, Aziz Abeer, Rani Anooja, Lee-Smith Wade, Aziz Muhammad

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Hospital St. Louis, MO, USA (Manesh Kumar Gangwani).

Department of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto University, Larkana, Pakistan (Priyanka Ahuja).

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(3):392-398. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0602. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypectomy is a widely used and effective procedure to treat precancerous polyps. Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB), a common complication of polypectomy, may diminish the utility of this procedure. Previous data on the efficacy of hemoclips has been conflicting, therefore we aimed to collectively evaluate and analyze the data to reach a definitive conclusion on the efficacy of using hemoclips to prevent incidences of DPPB in patients with large polyps (≥10 mm).

METHODS

We identified a total of 261 studies based on our previously defined search strategy. After screening, we included 6 randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed comparing the use of prophylactic application of hemoclips to a standard group without prophylactic clip placement for large polyps.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of DPPB when using hemoclips for large polyps. The overall incidence of DPPB was lower in the hemoclip group compared to the standard group for all large polyps ≥10 mm (relative risk 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.75; P=0.01; =0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of hemoclips in achieving hemostasis for large polyps has a beneficial effect and appears to prevent DPPB. This reinforces the routine clinical practice of using hemoclips in polypectomy procedures.

摘要

背景

息肉切除术是治疗癌前息肉广泛应用且有效的方法。息肉切除术后延迟出血(DPPB)是息肉切除术常见的并发症,可能会降低该手术的效用。以往关于止血夹疗效的数据存在矛盾,因此我们旨在汇总评估和分析数据,以就使用止血夹预防大息肉(≥10毫米)患者发生DPPB的疗效得出明确结论。

方法

根据我们先前确定的检索策略,共识别出261项研究。筛选后,纳入6项随机对照试验。进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了对大息肉预防性应用止血夹与未预防性放置夹子的标准组。

结果

我们发现,对大息肉使用止血夹时,DPPB的发生率有统计学意义上显著降低。对于所有≥10毫米的大息肉,止血夹组DPPB的总体发生率低于标准组(相对风险0.51,95%置信区间0.35 - 0.75;P = 0.01;I² = 0%)。

结论

使用止血夹实现大息肉止血具有有益效果,似乎可预防DPPB。这强化了在息肉切除术中使用止血夹的常规临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b9/8079868/cee22f6fe223/AnnGastroenterol-34-392-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验