Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Precision Monitoring to Transform Care (PRIS-M) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Indianapolis, IN, USA.
VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Veteran Health Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1715-1723. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4735-9. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
Patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIA) are at high risk of subsequent vascular events. Hospitalization improves quality of care, yet admission rates for TIA patients vary considerably.
We sought to identify factors associated with the decision to admit patents with TIA.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a prior study's data including semi-structured interviews, administrative data, and chart review.
We interviewed multidisciplinary clinical staff involved with TIA care. Administrative data included information for TIA patients in emergency departments or inpatient settings at VA medical centers (VAMCs) for fiscal years (FY) 2011 and 2014. Chart reviews were conducted on a subset of patients from 12 VAMCs in FY 2011.
For the qualitative data, we focused on interviewees' responses to the prompt: "Tell me what influences you in the decision to or not to admit TIA patients." We used administrative data to identify admission rates and chart review data to identify ABCD scores (a tool to classify stroke risk after TIA).
Providers' decisions to admit TIA patients were related to uncertainty in several domains: lack of a facility TIA-specific policy, inconsistent use of ABCD score, and concerns about facilities' ability to complete a timely workup. There was a disconnect between staff perceptions about TIA admission and facility admission rates. According to chart review data, staff at facilities with higher admission rates in FY 2011 reported consistent reliance on ABCD scores and related guidelines in admission decision-making.
Many factors contributed to decisions regarding admitting a patient with TIA; however, clinicians' uncertainty appeared to be a key driver. Further quality improvement interventions for TIA care should focus on facility adoption of TIA protocols to address uncertainty in TIA admission decision-making and to standardize timely evaluation of TIA patients and delivery of secondary prevention strategies.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者存在较高的后续血管事件风险。住院可改善治疗质量,但 TIA 患者的入院率差异较大。
我们旨在确定与 TIA 患者入院决策相关的因素。
我们对先前研究的数据进行了二次分析,包括半结构化访谈、行政数据和病历回顾。
我们采访了涉及 TIA 护理的多学科临床工作人员。行政数据包括 VA 医疗中心(VAMC)急诊科或住院患者的 TIA 患者信息,时间范围为 2011 财年和 2014 财年。在 2011 财年,对 12 个 VAMC 的部分患者进行了病历回顾。
对于定性数据,我们重点关注受访者对以下提示的回答:“告诉我影响您决定是否收治 TIA 患者的因素。”我们使用行政数据来确定入院率,使用病历回顾数据来确定 ABCD 评分(一种用于分类 TIA 后中风风险的工具)。
TIA 患者入院决策与多个领域的不确定性有关:缺乏特定于 TIA 的机构政策、ABCD 评分使用不一致,以及对机构完成及时检查能力的担忧。工作人员对 TIA 入院的看法与机构入院率之间存在脱节。根据病历回顾数据,2011 财年入院率较高的机构工作人员报告说,在入院决策中一致依赖 ABCD 评分和相关指南。
许多因素导致了 TIA 患者的入院决策;然而,临床医生的不确定性似乎是一个关键驱动因素。进一步的 TIA 护理质量改进干预措施应侧重于机构采用 TIA 方案,以解决 TIA 入院决策中的不确定性,并标准化 TIA 患者的及时评估和二级预防策略的实施。