• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估退伍军人新发性短暂性神经症状快速评估方案(PREVENT)对改善短暂性脑缺血发作护理质量的影响:一项非随机群组试验。

Assessment of the Protocol-Guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT) Program for Improving Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack: A Nonrandomized Cluster Trial.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Precision Monitoring to Transform Care Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Department of Veterans Affairs, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015920. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15920.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15920
PMID:32897372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7489850/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent vascular events. Timely management can reduce that risk by 70%; however, gaps in TIA quality of care exist.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the Protocol-Guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT) intervention to improve TIA quality of care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized cluster trial with matched controls evaluated a multicomponent intervention to improve TIA quality of care at 6 diverse medical centers in 6 geographically diverse states in the US and assessed change over time in quality of care among 36 matched control sites (6 control sites matched to each PREVENT site on TIA patient volume, facility complexity, and quality of care). The study period (defined as the data period) started on August 21, 2015, and extended to May 12, 2019, including 1-year baseline and active implementation periods for each site. The intervention targeted clinical teams caring for patients with TIA.

INTERVENTION

The quality improvement (QI) intervention included the following 5 components: clinical programs, data feedback, professional education, electronic health record tools, and QI support.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the without-fail rate, which was calculated as the proportion of veterans with TIA at a specific facility who received all 7 guideline-recommended processes of care for which they were eligible (ie, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, antithrombotic use, brain imaging, carotid artery imaging, high- or moderate-potency statin therapy, hypertension control, and neurological consultation). Generalized mixed-effects models with multilevel hierarchical random effects were constructed to evaluate the intervention associations with the change in the mean without-fail rate from the 1-year baseline period to the 1-year intervention period.

RESULTS

Six facilities implemented the PREVENT QI intervention, and 36 facilities were identified as matched control sites. The mean (SD) age of patients at baseline was 69.85 (11.19) years at PREVENT sites and 71.66 (11.29) years at matched control sites. Most patients were male (95.1% [154 of 162] at PREVENT sites and 94.6% [920 of 973] at matched control sites at baseline). Among the PREVENT sites, the mean without-fail rate improved substantially from 36.7% (58 of 158 patients) at baseline to 54.0% (95 of 176 patients) during a 1-year implementation period (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.27-3.48; P = .004). Comparing the change in quality at the PREVENT sites with the matched control sites, the improvement in the mean without-fail rate was greater at the PREVENT sites than at the matched control sites (36.7% [58 of 158 patients] to 54.0% [95 of 176 patients] [17.3% absolute improvement] vs 38.6% [345 of 893 patients] to 41.8% [363 of 869 patients] [3.2% absolute improvement], respectively; absolute difference, 14%; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The implementation of this multifaceted program was associated with improved TIA quality of care across the participating sites. The PREVENT QI program is an example of a health care system using QI strategies to improve performance, and may serve as a model for other health systems seeking to provide better care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02769338.

摘要

重要性

短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者发生血管再发事件的风险很高。及时的管理可以将这种风险降低 70%;然而,TIA 护理质量仍存在差距。

目的

评估 Protocol-Guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms(PREVENT)干预措施对改善 TIA 护理质量的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项非随机的多中心对照试验,评估了一项多成分干预措施,以改善美国 6 个地理位置不同的州的 6 个不同医疗中心的 TIA 护理质量,并评估了 36 个匹配的对照组中 TIA 患者数量、设施复杂性和护理质量等方面的质量改善情况。研究期间(定义为数据期)从 2015 年 8 月 21 日开始,一直持续到 2019 年 5 月 12 日,包括每个站点的 1 年基线期和积极实施期。该干预措施针对的是治疗 TIA 患者的临床团队。

干预措施

质量改进(QI)干预措施包括以下 5 个部分:临床方案、数据反馈、专业教育、电子健康记录工具和 QI 支持。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是无失败率,定义为特定医疗机构内 TIA 患者接受所有 7 项符合条件的护理流程的比例(即,心房颤动的抗凝治疗、抗血栓药物使用、脑成像、颈动脉成像、高或中效他汀类药物治疗、高血压控制和神经科咨询)。使用具有多层次分层随机效应的广义混合效应模型来评估干预措施与从 1 年基线期到 1 年干预期的平均无失败率变化之间的关联。

结果

有 6 家机构实施了 PREVENT QI 干预措施,有 36 家机构被确定为匹配的对照组。基线时患者的平均(SD)年龄为 PREVENT 组的 69.85(11.19)岁,匹配对照组的 71.66(11.29)岁。大多数患者为男性(PREVENT 组为 95.1%[154/162],匹配对照组为 94.6%[920/973])。在 PREVENT 组中,无失败率从基线时的 36.7%(158 例患者中的 58 例)显著提高到 1 年实施期间的 54.0%(176 例患者中的 95 例)(调整后的优势比,2.10;95%置信区间,1.27-3.48;P = .004)。将 PREVENT 组与匹配对照组的质量变化进行比较,PREVENT 组的无失败率改善幅度大于匹配对照组(36.7%[158 例患者中的 58 例]至 54.0%[176 例患者中的 95 例],改善 17.3%;38.6%[893 例患者中的 345 例]至 41.8%[869 例患者中的 363 例],改善 3.2%;绝对差异,14%;P = .008)。

结论和相关性

该多方面计划的实施与参与机构的 TIA 护理质量提高有关。PREVENT QI 计划是医疗保健系统使用 QI 策略来提高绩效的一个例子,可能成为其他寻求提供更好护理的医疗系统的典范。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02769338。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b1/7489850/18722b6b4c04/jamanetwopen-e2015920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b1/7489850/3dfc0362d64d/jamanetwopen-e2015920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b1/7489850/18722b6b4c04/jamanetwopen-e2015920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b1/7489850/3dfc0362d64d/jamanetwopen-e2015920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5b1/7489850/18722b6b4c04/jamanetwopen-e2015920-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Protocol-Guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT) Program for Improving Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack: A Nonrandomized Cluster Trial.评估退伍军人新发性短暂性神经症状快速评估方案(PREVENT)对改善短暂性脑缺血发作护理质量的影响:一项非随机群组试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015920. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15920.
2
The protocol-guided rapid evaluation of veterans experiencing new transient neurological symptoms (PREVENT) quality improvement program: rationale and methods.《退伍军人新发短暂性神经症状快速评估的方案指导(PREVENT)质量改进计划:基本原理和方法》
BMC Neurol. 2019 Nov 20;19(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1517-x.
3
Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack.一项复杂干预措施提高退伍军人短暂性脑缺血发作患者治疗及时性的实施评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Quality of Care for Veterans With Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke. Veterans 一过性脑缺血发作和小卒中的护理质量。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):419-427. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4648.
5
The Perils of a "My Work Here is Done" perspective: a mixed methods evaluation of sustainment of an evidence-based intervention for transient ischemic attack.“我已完成任务”观点的危害:对一项基于证据的短暂性脑缺血发作干预措施维持情况的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08207-8.
6
Acceptability of a complex team-based quality improvement intervention for transient ischemic attack: a mixed-methods study.接受基于复杂团队的短暂性脑缺血发作质量改进干预的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06318-2.
7
Processes of Care Associated With Risk of Mortality and Recurrent Stroke Among Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Nonsevere Ischemic Stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作和非严重性缺血性脑卒中患者的护理流程与死亡率和再次脑卒中风险的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6716.
8
Modelling care quality for patients after a transient ischaemic attack within the US Veterans Health Administration.在美国退伍军人健康管理局内对短暂性脑缺血发作后患者的护理质量进行建模。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Dec 4;8(4):e000641. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000641. eCollection 2019.
9
Development and Validation of Electronic Quality Measures to Assess Care for Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke.用于评估短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中患者护理的电子质量指标的开发与验证
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003157.
10
Empowering Implementation Teams with a Learning Health System Approach: Leveraging Data to Improve Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack.采用学习型健康系统方法增强实施团队能力:利用数据提高短暂性脑缺血发作的护理质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06160-y. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a "Kickoff" to build implementation partner teams and action plans for active implementation of a quality improvement project.通过“启动会”来组建实施伙伴团队,并制定行动计划以积极推进质量改进项目的实施。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 10;5:1580653. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1580653. eCollection 2025.
2
Finding the right dose: a scoping review examining facilitation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based stroke care.确定合适的剂量:一项范围综述,考察促进措施作为基于证据的中风护理实施策略的情况。
Implement Sci. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01415-w.
3
Development of transient ischemic attack risk prediction model suitable for initializing a learning health system unit using electronic medical records.

本文引用的文献

1
The protocol-guided rapid evaluation of veterans experiencing new transient neurological symptoms (PREVENT) quality improvement program: rationale and methods.《退伍军人新发短暂性神经症状快速评估的方案指导(PREVENT)质量改进计划:基本原理和方法》
BMC Neurol. 2019 Nov 20;19(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1517-x.
2
Power calculation in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with reduced intervention sustainability effect.具有降低的干预可持续性效应的阶梯楔形整群随机试验中的功效计算
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(4):663-674. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633658. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Processes of Care Associated With Risk of Mortality and Recurrent Stroke Among Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Nonsevere Ischemic Stroke.
开发适用于使用电子病历初始化学习健康系统单元的短暂性脑缺血发作风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02767-x.
4
Real-world analysis of two ischaemic stroke and TIA systolic blood pressure goals on 12-month mortality and recurrent vascular events.真实世界研究:两种缺血性卒中和 TIA 收缩压目标与 12 个月死亡率和复发性血管事件的关系。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Nov 5;9(5):519-529. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002759.
5
Stroke Learning Health Systems: A Topical Narrative Review With Case Examples.卒中学习健康系统:一个具有案例分析的专题叙事性综述。
Stroke. 2023 Apr;54(4):1148-1159. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.036216. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Benefits and harms of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in nursing home residents with advanced dementia.养老院中患有晚期痴呆的房颤患者应用口服抗凝剂的获益与危害。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):561-568. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18108. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
7
Simulation of a machine learning enabled learning health system for risk prediction using synthetic patient data.使用合成患者数据模拟机器学习支持的学习健康系统进行风险预测。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 26;12(1):17917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23011-4.
8
Identifying transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients at high-risk of adverse outcomes: development and validation of an approach using electronic health record data.识别发生不良结局风险较高的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者:一种基于电子健康记录数据的方法的建立和验证。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 12;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02776-1.
9
The Perils of a "My Work Here is Done" perspective: a mixed methods evaluation of sustainment of an evidence-based intervention for transient ischemic attack.“我已完成任务”观点的危害:对一项基于证据的短暂性脑缺血发作干预措施维持情况的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08207-8.
10
Pairing regression and configurational analysis in health services research: modelling outcomes in an observational cohort using a split-sample design.配对回归和配置分析在卫生服务研究中的应用:采用分割样本设计对观察队列的结果进行建模。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e061469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061469.
短暂性脑缺血发作和非严重性缺血性脑卒中患者的护理流程与死亡率和再次脑卒中风险的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6716.
4
Effect of a Quality Improvement Intervention on Adherence to Therapies for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.质量改进干预对急性缺血性卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作患者治疗依从性的影响:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):932-941. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1012.
5
Motivating and engaging frontline providers in measuring and improving team clinical performance.激励一线医疗服务提供者参与衡量和改善团队临床绩效。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):405-411. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008856. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Uncertainty as a Key Influence in the Decision To Admit Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack.不确定性是决定是否收治短暂性脑缺血发作患者的关键影响因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1715-1723. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4735-9. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States.美国综合卒中中心与初级卒中中心急性缺血性卒中治疗及预后的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004512. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004512.
8
Effect of a Quality Improvement Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Patients in India With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ACS QUIK Randomized Clinical Trial.质量改进干预对印度急性心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响:急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):567-578. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21906.
9
The Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial: Evaluation by Rolling Deployment.阶梯楔形临床试验:滚动式实施评估
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):607-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21993.
10
Quality of Care for Veterans With Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke. Veterans 一过性脑缺血发作和小卒中的护理质量。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):419-427. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4648.