Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North College, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Artif Organs. 2019 Jun;43(6):561-568. doi: 10.1111/aor.13397. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of IABP combined with VA-ECMO versus VA-ECMO alone. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for English language articles published from inception to August 18, 2018. Observational studies comparing IABP combined with VA-ECMO with VA-ECMO were considered eligible for the current study. Twelve observational studies with 3704 patients were included. In the IABP combined with VA-ECMO group mortality was 59.7%, compared with 65.8% in the VA-ECMO alone group. The risk ratio (RR) for this comparison was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.02; P = 0.107; 59.7% vs. 65.8%). In the one-way sensitivity analysis for estimating the effect of each study on mortality, omission of each study did not make a significant difference. Furthermore, the proportion of patients weaned from VA-ECMO was significantly higher in IABP combined VA-ECMO group than in the VA-ECMO alone group (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.21-1.35; P < 0.001; 77.9% vs. 61.2%). IABP combined with VA-ECMO could improve success rate of weaning from VA-ECMO, but did not reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest.
主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)联合静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)在心原性休克或心脏骤停患者中的疗效仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是研究 IABP 联合 VA-ECMO 与单独 VA-ECMO 的短期临床结局。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 自成立至 2018 年 8 月 18 日发表的英文文献。比较 IABP 联合 VA-ECMO 与单独 VA-ECMO 的观察性研究被认为符合本研究的纳入标准。共纳入 12 项观察性研究,共 3704 例患者。在 IABP 联合 VA-ECMO 组,死亡率为 59.7%,而单独 VA-ECMO 组为 65.8%。两组比较的风险比(RR)为 0.90(95%置信区间 [CI],0.80-1.02;P=0.107;59.7% vs. 65.8%)。在对死亡率进行的一项敏感性分析中,每个研究对死亡率的影响估计,每个研究的排除都没有显著差异。此外,IABP 联合 VA-ECMO 组患者从 VA-ECMO 脱机率明显高于单独 VA-ECMO 组(RR,1.28;95%CI,1.21-1.35;P<0.001;77.9% vs. 61.2%)。IABP 联合 VA-ECMO 可提高从 VA-ECMO 脱机的成功率,但不能降低心原性休克或心脏骤停患者的住院死亡率。