• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良行为还是社会失败?对导致驾驶员从事致命五行为的因素的看法。

Bad behaviour or societal failure? Perceptions of the factors contributing to drivers' engagement in the fatal five driving behaviours.

机构信息

Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, 4558, Australia.

Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, 4558, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.008
PMID:30487095
Abstract

The so-called 'fatal five' behaviours (drink and drug driving, distraction and inattention, speeding, fatigue, and failure to wear a seat belt) are known to be the major behavioural contributory factors to road trauma. However, little is known about the factors that lead to drivers engaging in each behaviour. This article presents the findings from a study which collected and analysed data on the factors that lead to drivers engaging in each behaviour. The study involved a survey of drivers' perceptions of the causes of each behaviour and a subject matter expert workshop to gain the views of road safety experts. The results were mapped onto a systems ergonomics model of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia, to show where in the system the factors reside. In addition to well-known factors relating to drivers' knowledge, experience and personality, additional factors at the higher levels of the road transport system related to road safety policy, transport system design, road rules and regulations, and societal issues were identified. It is concluded that the fatal five behaviours have a web of interacting contributory factors underpinning them and are systems problems rather than driver-centric problems. The implications for road safety interventions are discussed.

摘要

所谓的“致命五行为”(酒后和毒后驾驶、分神和注意力不集中、超速、疲劳以及不系安全带)被认为是导致道路创伤的主要行为因素。然而,导致驾驶员采取每种行为的因素却知之甚少。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究收集并分析了导致驾驶员采取每种行为的因素的数据。该研究涉及对驾驶员对每种行为原因的看法进行调查,以及举办一个主题专家研讨会以征求道路安全专家的意见。研究结果被映射到澳大利亚昆士兰州道路运输系统的系统工效学模型上,以显示系统中存在这些因素的位置。除了与驾驶员的知识、经验和个性相关的众所周知的因素外,还确定了与道路安全政策、交通系统设计、道路规则和法规以及社会问题相关的更高层次的道路运输系统中的其他因素。研究结论认为,“致命五行为”有一个相互关联的潜在因素网络,它们是系统问题,而不是以驾驶员为中心的问题。讨论了对道路安全干预措施的影响。

相似文献

1
Bad behaviour or societal failure? Perceptions of the factors contributing to drivers' engagement in the fatal five driving behaviours.不良行为还是社会失败?对导致驾驶员从事致命五行为的因素的看法。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Addressing the road trauma burden in China: Exploring attitudes, behaviours, risk perceptions and cultural uniqueness.应对中国道路创伤负担:探索态度、行为、风险认知和文化独特性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
3
Truck drivers' opinion on road safety in Tanzania--a questionnaire study.坦桑尼亚卡车司机对道路安全的看法——一项问卷调查研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(1):103-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.671982.
4
Contributors to young drivers' driving styles - A comparison between Israel and Queensland.年轻驾驶员驾驶风格的影响因素——以以色列和昆士兰州为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Revisiting the concept of the 'problem young driver' within the context of the 'young driver problem': who are they?重新审视“问题青年驾驶员”概念在“青年驾驶员问题”背景下的内涵:他们是谁?
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
6
[Road traffic knowledge and behaviour of drivers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia].[沙特阿拉伯东部省份驾驶员的道路交通知识与行为]
East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):364-75.
7
Driving behaviours, traffic risk and road safety: comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore.驾驶行为、交通风险与道路安全:马来西亚与新加坡的比较研究
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2015;22(4):359-67. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2014.925938. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
8
Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia.谁掌控着道路安全?澳大利亚昆士兰州道路运输系统的STAMP控制结构分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
The effects of anti-speeding advertisements on the simulated driving behaviour of young drivers.反超速广告对年轻驾驶员模拟驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
10
Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What makes drivers slow down in work zones?工人风险或车辆损坏:是什么让司机在工作区减速?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):177-181. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1878354. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study on apparent and latent contributing factors to driving errors in Iran.伊朗驾驶失误的明显和潜在促成因素的定性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 10;14(1):21127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71833-1.
2
The Predictors of Unsafe Behaviors among Nuclear Power Plant Workers: An Investigation Integrating Personality, Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors.核电厂工人不安全行为的预测因素:综合人格、认知和态度因素的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010820.
3
Drink driving during the COVID-19 pandemic.
新冠疫情期间的酒驾行为。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2021 Apr;78:369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
A Road Safety-Based Selection Methodology for Professional Drivers: Behaviour and Accident Rate Analysis.基于道路安全的专业驾驶员选择方法:行为与事故率分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312487.
5
COVID-19 and transport: Findings from a world-wide expert survey.新型冠状病毒肺炎与交通运输:一项全球专家调查的结果
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Mar;103:68-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
A systematic review of statistical models and outcomes of predicting fatal and serious injury crashes from driver crash and offense history data.系统评价预测驾驶员事故和违规历史数据中致命和严重事故的统计模型和结果。
Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 28;9(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01475-7.
7
The relevance of U.S. Strategic Highway Safety Plans in a future context.美国战略公路安全计划在未来背景下的相关性。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 7;14(10):e0223646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223646. eCollection 2019.
8
Integrating complex systems science into road safety research and practice, part 1: review of formative concepts.将复杂系统科学融入道路安全研究与实践,第 1 部分:形成性概念综述。
Inj Prev. 2020 Apr;26(2):177-183. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043315. Epub 2019 Sep 24.