• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核电厂工人不安全行为的预测因素:综合人格、认知和态度因素的研究。

The Predictors of Unsafe Behaviors among Nuclear Power Plant Workers: An Investigation Integrating Personality, Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors.

机构信息

Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010820.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20010820
PMID:36613142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819622/
Abstract

Unsafe behaviors, such as violations and human errors, have long been recognized as the main causes of accidents in nuclear power plants (NPPs). However, personal factors that influence unsafe behaviors among NPP workers have not been well examined, especially in an integrated model. This study proposes an integrated contextual mediated model to examine personality, cognitive and attitudinal predictors of unsafe behaviors among commissioning workers at NPPs. The model was verified using structural equation modeling technique with survey data from 177 commissioning workers in two Chinese NPPs. Results show that personality traits (i.e., conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness and agreeableness), executive function and safety attitudes exerted significant effects on unsafe behaviors. In addition, the effects of agreeableness and executive function were partly mediated by safety attitudes. Both conscientiousness and neuroticism indirectly influenced unsafe behaviors through the mediating role of executive function. The findings shed light on the design of evidence-based interventions for safety performance in NPPs.

摘要

不安全行为,如违规和人为失误,长期以来一直被认为是核电站(NPP)事故的主要原因。然而,影响核电站工作人员不安全行为的个人因素尚未得到很好的研究,特别是在综合模型中。本研究提出了一个综合的情境中介模型,以检验核电站调试工人不安全行为的人格、认知和态度预测因素。该模型使用来自中国两个核电站的 177 名调试工人的调查数据,通过结构方程模型技术进行了验证。结果表明,人格特质(即尽责性、神经质、开放性和宜人性)、执行功能和安全态度对不安全行为有显著影响。此外,宜人性和执行功能的影响部分通过安全态度的中介作用来体现。尽责性和神经质通过执行功能的中介作用间接影响不安全行为。研究结果为核电站安全绩效的基于证据的干预措施设计提供了启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0331/9819622/852d06edf029/ijerph-20-00820-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0331/9819622/ef10961d41af/ijerph-20-00820-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0331/9819622/852d06edf029/ijerph-20-00820-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0331/9819622/ef10961d41af/ijerph-20-00820-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0331/9819622/852d06edf029/ijerph-20-00820-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Predictors of Unsafe Behaviors among Nuclear Power Plant Workers: An Investigation Integrating Personality, Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors.核电厂工人不安全行为的预测因素:综合人格、认知和态度因素的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010820.
2
Characterizing the relationship between personality traits and safety motivation among construction workers.探究建筑工人个性特质与安全动机之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20370. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20370. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Effects of personality traits and sociocognitive determinants on risky riding behaviors among Chinese e-bikers.人格特质和社会认知决定因素对中国电动自行车骑手危险骑行行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):838-843. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1655144. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
Executive functions, Personality traits and ADHD symptoms in adolescents: A mediation analysis.青少年的执行功能、人格特质与 ADHD 症状:中介分析。
PLoS One. 2020 May 6;15(5):e0232470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232470. eCollection 2020.
5
Examining the Relationship between Mindfulness, Personality, and National Culture for Construction Safety.考察正念、人格与国家文化对建筑安全的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 8;18(9):4998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094998.
6
Neuroticism predicts informant reported cognitive problems through health behaviors.神经质通过健康行为预测告知者报告的认知问题。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Dec;25(12):2191-2199. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1839857. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: the role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety.公交车司机碰撞风险与异常驾驶行为:个性和交通安全态度的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jun;79:145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
The relationship between driving skill and driving behavior: Psychometric adaptation of the Driver Skill Inventory in China.驾驶技能与驾驶行为之间的关系:驾驶技能量表在中国的心理测量学适应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions.人格与工作场所安全的元分析:解决未解答的问题。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):481-98. doi: 10.1037/a0037916. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
10
Personality Change in the Preclinical Phase of Alzheimer Disease.阿尔茨海默病临床前期的人格改变
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1259-1265. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2816.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mediation of Workplace Upward Networking on Affective Leadership and Employee Safety Voice Among Primary Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作场所向上社交网络对初级护士情感领导与员工安全建言的中介作用:一项横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 19;2025:5127212. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5127212. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Voice Endorsement and Employee Safety Voice Behavior in Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange.建筑项目中的语音认可与员工安全语音行为:领导成员交换的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063374.
2
The Role of Executive Functioning and Technological Anxiety (FOMO) in College Course Performance as Mediated by Technology Usage and Multitasking Habits.执行功能和技术焦虑(错失恐惧症)在大学课程表现中的作用:以技术使用和多任务处理习惯为中介
Psicol Educ (Madr). 2018;24(1):14-25. doi: 10.5093/psed2018a3. Epub 2017 May 25.
3
Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants.
预测核电厂的错误、违规和安全参与行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;17(15):5613. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155613.
4
Executive function and dangerous driving behaviors in young drivers.年轻驾驶员的执行功能与危险驾驶行为
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2018 Jan;52:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.007.
5
Driving Anger, Aberrant Driving Behaviors, and Road Crash Risk: Testing of a Mediated Model.驾驶愤怒、异常驾驶行为与道路碰撞风险:中介模型检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;16(3):297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030297.
6
Bad behaviour or societal failure? Perceptions of the factors contributing to drivers' engagement in the fatal five driving behaviours.不良行为还是社会失败?对导致驾驶员从事致命五行为的因素的看法。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Personality factors and safety attitudes predict safety behaviour and accidents in elevator workers.人格因素和安全态度可预测电梯工的安全行为和事故。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Dec;26(4):719-727. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1493259. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
8
Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice.在李克特量表中使用反向项目:一种有问题的做法。
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):149-158. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.33.
9
Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications.核能:在全球电力需求、全球脱碳紧迫性和全球环境影响之间。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Mar 1;209:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.043. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Executive Function Capacities, Negative Driving Behavior and Crashes in Young Drivers.年轻驾驶员的执行功能能力、负面驾驶行为与撞车事故
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 28;14(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111314.