• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 ePlex 血培养鉴定板在检测血流感染病原体中的应用。

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections.

机构信息

Laboratory of Microbiology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium

Laboratory of Microbiology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01597-18. Print 2019 Feb.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01597-18
PMID:30487304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6355516/
Abstract

Rapid identification and susceptibility testing results are of importance for the early appropriate therapy of bloodstream infections. The ePlex (GenMark Diagnostics) blood culture identification (BCID) panels are fully automated PCR-based assays designed to identify Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and bacterial resistance genes within 1.5 h from positive blood culture. Consecutive non-duplicate positive blood culture episodes were tested by the ePlex system prospectively. The choice of panel(s) (Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and/or fungal pathogens) was defined by Gram-stained microscopy of blood culture-positive bottles (BacT/Alert; bioMérieux). Results with the ePlex panels were compared to the identification results obtained by standard culture-based workflow. In total, 216 positive blood culture episodes were evaluable, yielding 263 identification results. The sensitivity/positive predictive value for detection by the ePlex panels of targeted cultured isolates were 97% and 99% for the Gram-positive panel and 99% and 96% for the Gram-negative panel, resulting in overall agreement rates of 96% and 94% for the Gram-positive and Gram-negative panel, respectively. All 26 samples with targeted resistance results were correctly detected by the ePlex panels. The ePlex panels provided highly accurate results and proved to be an excellent diagnostic tool for the rapid identification of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. The short time to results may be of added value for optimizing the clinical management of patients with sepsis.

摘要

快速鉴定和药敏试验结果对于血流感染的早期适当治疗非常重要。ePlex(GenMark Diagnostics)血培养鉴定(BCID)试剂盒是完全自动化的基于 PCR 的检测方法,旨在从阳性血培养物中 1.5 小时内鉴定革兰阳性和革兰阴性细菌、真菌和细菌耐药基因。连续的非重复阳性血培养物通过 ePlex 系统进行前瞻性检测。面板(革兰阳性、革兰阴性和/或真菌病原体)的选择由阳性血培养瓶革兰氏染色显微镜检查(BacT/Alert;bioMérieux)定义。ePlex 试剂盒的结果与基于标准培养的工作流程获得的鉴定结果进行比较。总共评估了 216 个阳性血培养物,产生了 263 个鉴定结果。ePlex 试剂盒对目标培养分离株的检测灵敏度/阳性预测值,革兰阳性面板为 97%和 99%,革兰阴性面板为 99%和 96%,因此革兰阳性和革兰阴性面板的总符合率分别为 96%和 94%。所有 26 个有目标耐药结果的样本均被 ePlex 试剂盒正确检出。ePlex 试剂盒提供了高度准确的结果,是快速鉴定引起血流感染的病原体的优秀诊断工具。结果的获得时间短,可能对优化脓毒症患者的临床管理具有附加价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/6355516/5c93a7ed6ec3/JCM.01597-18-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/6355516/5de20569ab9d/JCM.01597-18-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/6355516/5c93a7ed6ec3/JCM.01597-18-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/6355516/5de20569ab9d/JCM.01597-18-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/6355516/5c93a7ed6ec3/JCM.01597-18-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections.评估 ePlex 血培养鉴定板在检测血流感染病原体中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01597-18. Print 2019 Feb.
2
Accuracy of Broad-Panel PCR-Based Bacterial Identification for Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Oncology Population.广谱 PCR 检测在儿科肿瘤人群血培养中的细菌鉴定准确性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0022121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00221-21. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures.利用 ePlex 血培养鉴定板对实验室影响的深入观察:利用快速分子检测对阳性血培养物的工作流程分析。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0179622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01796-22. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures.评估两种快速分子检测系统,以建立一种从阳性血培养物中快速鉴定细菌病原体的算法。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia.ePlex血培养鉴定板对菌血症和真菌血症快速诊断的微生物学性能及潜在临床影响评估
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Nov 26;10:594951. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594951. eCollection 2020.
6
The clinical impact of implementing GenMark ePlex blood culture panels for around-the-clock blood culture identification; a prospective observational study.实施 GenMark ePlex 血培养板进行 24 小时血培养鉴定的临床影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Oct;52(10):705-712. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1775882. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.一项多中心临床研究,旨在验证 GenMark Dx ePlex 血培养鉴定革兰氏阴性菌 panel 的诊断准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0248420. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02484-20.
8
Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel.新型GenMark Dx ePlex血培养鉴定革兰氏阳性菌检测板的临床性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01730-19.
9
Rapid identification of bloodstream bacterial and fungal pathogens and their antibiotic resistance determinants from positively flagged blood cultures using the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification panel.采用 BioFire FilmArray 血培养鉴定试剂盒,从阳性血培养物中快速鉴定血流细菌和真菌病原体及其抗生素耐药决定因素。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Dec;53(6):882-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Performance of ePlex® blood culture identification panels in clinical isolates and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities.ePlex®血培养鉴定板在临床分离株中的性能及抗菌药物管理机会的特征。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul;109(3):116269. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116269. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
New Diagnostics for Fungal Infections in Transplant Infectious Disease: A Systematic Review.移植传染病中真菌感染的新诊断方法:一项系统综述。
J Fungi (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;11(1):48. doi: 10.3390/jof11010048.
2
The role of rapid multiplex molecular syndromic panels in the clinical management of infections in critically ill patients: an experts-opinion document.快速多重分子综合征检测板在重症患者感染临床管理中的作用:一份专家意见文件。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 30;28(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05224-3.
3
Evaluation of a new protocol for rapid identification of in blood cultures using the modified bile solubility test: Gram staining is still standing.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cost-Effectiveness of Rapid Diagnostic Testing for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections with or without Antimicrobial Stewardship.快速诊断检测在有或没有抗菌药物管理的情况下用于诊断血流感染的成本效益。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 May 30;31(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00095-17. Print 2018 Jul.
2
Towards precision medicine in sepsis: a position paper from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.迈向脓毒症精准医学:欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会立场文件。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1264-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
3
Profile of GenMark's ePlex® blood culture identification fungal pathogen panel.
使用改良胆汁溶解试验对血培养中进行快速鉴定的新方案的评估:革兰氏染色仍然有效。
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jan 31;63(1):e0122224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01222-24. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
4
Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis.紧跟前沿:脓毒症中快速病原体及抗菌药物耐药性诊断
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091824.
5
Comparison of the Direct Identification and Short-Term Incubation Methods for Positive Blood Cultures via MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱对阳性血培养物进行直接鉴定和短期培养方法的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;14(15):1611. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151611.
6
A multisite validation of a two hours antibiotic susceptibility flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.从阳性血培养物中直接进行两小时抗生素药敏流式细胞术检测的多中心验证。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 May 28;24(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03341-1.
7
Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial.ePlex® 血培养鉴定试剂盒在快速诊断血流感染中的临床影响和成本-效果分析:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;43(6):1193-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04820-z. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
8
Shortening identification times: comparative observational study of three early blood culture testing protocols.缩短鉴定时间:三种早期血培养检测方案的比较观察性研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jul 18;13:1192002. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1192002. eCollection 2023.
9
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Non-albicans Candida Bloodstream Infections in Transplant Recipients and Cancer Patients.移植受者和癌症患者中非白色念珠菌血流感染的流行病学和结局。
Mycopathologia. 2023 Dec;188(6):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s11046-023-00765-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
10
Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments.侵袭性真菌感染的诊断:挑战与新进展。
J Biomed Sci. 2023 Jun 19;30(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12929-023-00926-2.
GenMark 的 ePlex® 血培养鉴定真菌病原体检测 panel 简介。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Feb;18(2):119-132. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1420476. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Multicenter Evaluation of the ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.多中心评估 ePlex 呼吸道病原体检测 panel 在检测鼻咽拭子中病毒和细菌呼吸道病原体中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01658-17. Print 2018 Feb.
5
Syndromic Panel-Based Testing in Clinical Microbiology.基于综合征的临床微生物学检测面板。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Nov 15;31(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00024-17. Print 2018 Jan.
6
Short-term incubation of positive blood cultures in brain-heart infusion broth accelerates identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry.将阳性血培养物在脑心浸液肉汤中进行短期培养,可通过基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱法加速细菌鉴定。
J Med Microbiol. 2017 Dec;66(12):1752-1758. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000643. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Thinking beyond the Common Candida Species: Need for Species-Level Identification of Candida Due to the Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris.超越常见念珠菌物种的思考:由于耐多药念珠菌耳念珠菌的出现,需要对念珠菌进行种水平鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec;55(12):3324-3327. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01355-17. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
8
Impact of rapid identification of positive blood cultures using the Verigene system on antibiotic prescriptions: A prospective study of community-onset bacteremia in a tertiary hospital in Japan.使用Verigene系统快速鉴定阳性血培养物对抗生素处方的影响:日本一家三级医院社区获得性菌血症的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181548. eCollection 2017.
9
Parallel Evaluation of the MALDI Sepsityper and Verigene BC-GN Assays for Rapid Identification of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI)Sepsityper法与Verigene BC-GN检测法对血培养阳性标本中革兰阴性杆菌快速鉴定的平行评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Sep;55(9):2708-2718. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00692-17. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Multidrug-resistant Candida auris: 'new kid on the block' in hospital-associated infections?多重耐药性耳念珠菌:医院相关感染中的“新面孔”?
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Nov;94(3):209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 15.