Carroll Karen C, Reid Jennifer L, Thornberg Adam, Whitfield Natalie N, Trainor Deirdre, Lewis Shawna, Wakefield Teresa, Davis Thomas E, Church Keisha G, Samuel Linoj, Mills Ray, Jim Patricia, Young Stephen, Nolte Frederick S
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
GenMark Diagnostics Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01730-19.
Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory's SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets ( group, spp., , , spp., , , , spp., , spp., , group, , and ), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets ( group, , , , and ), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: , 97.2%; , 100%; , 96.8%; and , 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle.
在许多临床微生物实验室中,从阳性血培养物中快速鉴定是标准治疗方法(SOC)。GenMark Dx ePlex血培养鉴定革兰氏阳性(BCID-GP)检测板是一种基于竞争性DNA杂交和使用eSensor技术的电化学检测的多重核酸扩增检测方法。这项多中心研究将仅供研究使用(IUO)的BCID-GP检测板与其他鉴定20种革兰氏阳性菌、四种抗菌药物耐药基因以及BCID-GP检测板特有的泛菌和泛革兰氏阴性靶标的方法进行了比较。美国各地的十个微生物实验室收集了残留的、已去除身份信息的阳性血培养样本进行分析。五个实验室使用BCID-GP检测板对临床样本和人工样本进行了检测。比较鉴定方法包括每个实验室的SOC,其中包括基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和自动鉴定系统,以及靶向PCR/经分析验证的实时PCR(qPCR)和双向测序。总共用BCID-GP检测板检测了2342个可评估样本(1777个临床样本和565个人工样本)。在不一致结果解决之前,检测板上生物体的总体样本准确率为89%。对于致病性革兰氏阳性靶标( 组、 spp.、 、 、 spp.、 、 、 、 spp.、 、 spp.、 、 组、 、 ),阳性百分一致率(PPA)和阴性百分一致率(NPA)分别为93.1%至100%和98.8%至100%。对于污染排除靶标( 组、 、 、 、 ),PPA和NPA分别为84.5%至100%和99.9%至100%。泛菌和泛革兰氏阴性靶标的PPA分别为92.4%和95.7%,NPA分别为99.9%和99.6%。耐药标志物的PPA如下: ,97.2%; , 100%; ,96.8%;以及 ,100%。阴性百分一致率为96.6%至100%。总之,ePlex BCID-GP检测板在鉴定阳性血培养瓶中的20种革兰氏阳性病原体和四种抗菌药物耐药基因方面,与SOC和靶向分子方法相比具有优势。该检测板可检测来自同一阳性血培养瓶的多种病原体以及酵母和革兰氏阴性菌的混合感染。