• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡贝缩宫素与缩宫素在积极处理第三产程预防产后出血中的比较

Comparison between Carbetocin and Oxytocin in Active Management of 3rd Stage of Labour in Preventing Post Partum Hemorrhage.

作者信息

Akhter P, Pal S N, Begum S

机构信息

Dr Parul Akhter, Assistant Professor, Department of Gynae & Obs, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2018 Oct;27(4):793-797.

PMID:30487496
Abstract

The third stage of labour is considered to be the most critical part of child birth due to the risk of post partum haemorrhage (PPH). To compare the effectiveness of carbetocin and oxytocin in the management of 3rd stage of labour in preventing post partum hemorrhage, this experimental clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Salimulla Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2015 to June 2016. Three hundred women undergoing normal vaginal delivery were consecutively enrolled. They were divided into two groups, one group was treated with carbetocin 100μg IV and another group was treated with oxytocin 10 unit IV. Post partum haemorrhage was developed in 23(15.3%) and 31(20.7%) patients in carbetocin and oxytocin groups respectively. Among these PPH patients, 17(73.9%) patients received oxytocin, 21(91.3%) patients received Ergometrin and 14(60.9%) patients received misoprostol in carbetocin group as additional drug. In oxytocin group 30(96.8) patients received ergometrin and 26(83.9) patients received misoprostol. Significantly higher number of patients was treated with balloon catheter in oxytocin group (77.4%) than carbetocin group (39.1%). Thirteen (41.9%) patients in oxytocin group and 4(17.4%) patients in carbetocin group needed to treat in ICU. In carbetocin Group I patient (4.3%) and in oxytocin Group II patients (6.5%) died. carbetocin is better than oxytocin in the management of 3rd stage of labour to prevent post partum haemorrhage (PPH).

摘要

由于产后出血(PPH)的风险,分娩的第三阶段被认为是分娩过程中最关键的部分。为比较卡贝缩宫素和缩宫素在预防分娩第三阶段产后出血中的有效性,于2015年1月至2016年6月在孟加拉国达卡的萨利穆拉爵士医学院医院妇产科进行了这项实验性临床试验。连续纳入300名接受正常阴道分娩的妇女。她们被分为两组,一组接受静脉注射100μg卡贝缩宫素治疗,另一组接受静脉注射10单位缩宫素治疗。卡贝缩宫素组和缩宫素组分别有23例(15.3%)和31例(20.7%)患者发生产后出血。在这些产后出血患者中,卡贝缩宫素组有17例(73.9%)患者接受了缩宫素治疗,21例(91.3%)患者接受了麦角新碱治疗,14例(60.9%)患者接受了米索前列醇作为额外药物治疗。在缩宫素组,30例(96.8%)患者接受了麦角新碱治疗,26例(83.9%)患者接受了米索前列醇治疗。缩宫素组接受球囊导管治疗的患者数量(77.4%)显著高于卡贝缩宫素组(39.1%)。缩宫素组有13例(41.9%)患者和卡贝缩宫素组有4例(17.4%)患者需要在重症监护病房治疗。卡贝缩宫素组有1例患者(4.3%)死亡,缩宫素组有2例患者(6.5%)死亡。在预防分娩第三阶段产后出血(PPH)方面,卡贝缩宫素比缩宫素效果更好。

相似文献

1
Comparison between Carbetocin and Oxytocin in Active Management of 3rd Stage of Labour in Preventing Post Partum Hemorrhage.卡贝缩宫素与缩宫素在积极处理第三产程预防产后出血中的比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2018 Oct;27(4):793-797.
2
Carbetocin versus rectal misoprostol for management of third stage of labor among women with low risk of postpartum hemorrhage.卡贝缩宫素与直肠米索前列醇在低产后出血风险产妇第三产程中的应用比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Feb;148(2):238-242. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13056. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Room temperature stable carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage during the third stage of labour in women delivering vaginally: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.用于预防经阴道分娩女性第三产程产后出血的室温稳定型卡贝缩宫素:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 17;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1271-y.
4
Carbetocin versus syntometrine for the third stage of labour following vaginal delivery--a double-blind randomised controlled trial.卡贝缩宫素与欣母沛用于阴道分娩后第三产程的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1461-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02226.x. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
5
Intramuscular oxytocin versus intravenous oxytocin to prevent postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery (LabOR trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.肌内注射缩宫素与静脉注射缩宫素预防阴道分娩后出血(LabOR试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2269-9.
6
Carbetocin versus oxytocin in the management of atonic post partum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery: a randomised controlled trial.卡贝缩宫素与缩宫素用于阴道分娩后宫缩乏力性产后出血(PPH)的处理:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3911-y. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
7
Utilization of carbetocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial.卡贝缩宫素在剖宫产术后预防产后出血中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;280(5):707-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-0973-8. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
8
Carbetocin versus syntometrine in the management of third stage of labor following vaginal delivery.卡贝缩宫素与欣母沛在阴道分娩后第三产程的应用比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;284(6):1359-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1851-8. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
9
Oxytocin agonists for preventing postpartum haemorrhage.用于预防产后出血的缩宫素激动剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD005457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005457.pub2.
10
A prospective cohort study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of carbetocin for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in caesarean sections.一项评估卡贝缩宫素预防剖宫产产后出血成本效益的前瞻性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jul;37(5):601-604. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1284188. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Side effects of oxytocin and carbetocin for mangement at third trimester.缩宫素和卡贝缩宫素用于孕晚期管理的副作用。
Bioinformation. 2024 Oct 31;20(10):1405-1409. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001405. eCollection 2024.
2
An Implementation Research Study on Uterotonics Use Patterns and Heat-stable Carbetocin Acceptability and Safety for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Nigeria.尼日利亚关于子宫收缩剂使用模式以及热稳定卡贝缩宫素预防产后出血的可接受性和安全性的实施研究
Int J MCH AIDS. 2024 Sep 23;13(Suppl 1):S38-S45. doi: 10.25259/IJMA_1_2024. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Implementing Heat-Stable Carbetocin for Postpartum Haemorrhage Prevention in Low-Resource Settings: A Rapid Scoping Review.
在资源匮乏环境下实施卡贝缩宫素预防产后出血:快速范围界定综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3765. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073765.