Kemény Ferenc, Gangl Melanie, Banfi Chiara, Bakos Sarolta, Perchtold Corinna M, Papousek Ilona, Moll Kristina, Landerl Karin
Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Nov 14;12:449. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00449. eCollection 2018.
Efficient and automatic integration of letters and speech sounds is assumed to enable fluent word recognition and may in turn also underlie the build-up of high-quality orthographic representations, which are relevant for accurate spelling. While previous research showed that developmental dyslexia is associated with deficient letter-speech sound integration, these studies did not differentiate between subcomponents of literacy skills. In order to investigate whether deficient letter-speech sound integration is associated with deficits in reading and/or spelling, three groups of third graders were recruited: (1) children with combined deficits in reading and spelling (RSD, = 10); (2) children with isolated spelling deficit (ISD, = 17); and (3) typically developing children (TD, = 21). We assessed the neural correlates (EEG) of letter-speech sound integration using a Stroop-like interference paradigm: participants had to decide whether two visually presented letters look identical. In case of non-identical letter pairs, conflict items were the same letter in lower and upper case (e.g., "T t"), while non-conflict items were different letters (e.g., "T k"). In terms of behavioral results, each of the three groups exhibited a comparable amount of conflict-related reaction time (RT) increase, which may be a sign for no general inhibitory deficits. Event-related potentials (ERPs), on the other hand, revealed group-based differences: the amplitudes of the centro-parietal conflict slow potential (cSP) were increased for conflicting items in typical readers as well as the ISD group. Preliminary results suggest that this effect was missing for children with RSD. The results suggest that deficits in automatized letter-speech sound associations are associated with reading deficit, but no impairment was observed in spelling deficit.
高效且自动地整合字母和语音被认为能够实现流畅的单词识别,进而也可能是高质量正字法表征形成的基础,而高质量正字法表征对于准确拼写至关重要。虽然先前的研究表明发育性阅读障碍与字母 - 语音整合不足有关,但这些研究并未区分读写技能的子成分。为了探究字母 - 语音整合不足是否与阅读和/或拼写缺陷相关,招募了三组三年级学生:(1)阅读和拼写都有缺陷的儿童(RSD,n = 10);(2)有孤立拼写缺陷的儿童(ISD,n = 17);以及(3)发育正常的儿童(TD,n = 21)。我们使用类似斯特鲁普干扰范式评估了字母 - 语音整合的神经关联(脑电图):参与者必须判断两个视觉呈现的字母是否相同。对于不相同的字母对,冲突项目是大小写相同的字母(例如,“T t”),而非冲突项目是不同的字母(例如,“T k”)。在行为结果方面,三组中的每一组都表现出与冲突相关的反应时间(RT)增加量相当,这可能表明没有普遍的抑制缺陷。另一方面,事件相关电位(ERP)显示出基于组别的差异:典型读者以及ISD组中冲突项目的中央顶叶冲突慢电位(cSP)的振幅增加。初步结果表明,RSD儿童没有这种效应。结果表明,自动化字母 - 语音关联的缺陷与阅读缺陷相关,但在拼写缺陷中未观察到损伤。