Suppr超能文献

强迫症认知行为疗法反应的预测因素。

Predictors of response to cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

Kyrios Michael, Hordern Celia, Fassnacht Daniel B

机构信息

The Australian National University, Australia.

Private Practice, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Sep-Dec;15(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

Abstract

Response to psychological treatment for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) varies, and dropout and relapse rates remain troubling. However, while studies examining symptom reductions are favourable, outcomes are less encouraging when outcome is defined in terms of clinically significant change. Moreover, there is little understanding of what predicts treatment outcome. This study examined demographic, symptomatic and cognitive predictors of outcome in 79 participants undertaking individualised cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. After investigating differences between treatment completers and non-completers, we examined treatment response as defined by post-treatment symptom severity and clinically reliable change, as well as predictors of treatment response. Completers were less likely to present with co-morbidity. The treatment was highly efficacious irrespective of whether completer or intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken, with 58% of treatment completers considered "recovered" at post-treatment. Lower pre-treatment levels of OCD symptoms and greater perfectionism/intolerance of uncertainty were the best unique predictors of OCD severity outcomes at post-treatment. Changes in obsessional beliefs were associated with symptomatic change, although only perfectionism/intolerance of uncertainty was a significant unique predictor of post-treatment change. Recovery status was predicted only by pre-treatment OCD severity. In helping to identify those at risk for poorer outcomes, such research can lead to the development of more effective interventions.

摘要

强迫症(OCD)心理治疗的反应因人而异,脱落率和复发率仍然令人担忧。然而,虽然研究显示症状减轻情况良好,但从临床显著变化的角度定义结果时,结果却不那么令人鼓舞。此外,对于预测治疗结果的因素了解甚少。本研究调查了79名接受个体化认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的参与者的人口统计学、症状和认知预测因素。在研究治疗完成者和未完成者之间的差异后,我们根据治疗后症状严重程度和临床可靠变化来检查治疗反应,以及治疗反应的预测因素。完成治疗者出现共病的可能性较小。无论采用完成治疗者分析还是意向性分析,该治疗都非常有效,58%的治疗完成者在治疗后被认为“康复”。治疗前较低的强迫症症状水平和更高的完美主义/对不确定性的不容忍是治疗后强迫症严重程度结果的最佳独特预测因素。强迫观念的改变与症状变化相关,尽管只有完美主义/对不确定性的不容忍是治疗后变化的显著独特预测因素。康复状态仅由治疗前的强迫症严重程度预测。此类研究有助于识别那些预后较差的风险人群,从而推动更有效干预措施的发展。

相似文献

1
Predictors of response to cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Sep-Dec;15(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
6
Internet cognitive behavioural treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomised controlled trial.
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
A novel approach to challenging OCD related beliefs using a mobile-app: An exploratory study.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Cognitive Mediation of Symptom Change in Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Behav Ther. 2016 Jul;47(4):474-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
A Pilot Investigation of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Clinical Perfectionism in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 May;45(3):312-320. doi: 10.1017/S1352465816000618. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

4
Intolerance of Uncertainty as a Cognitive Vulnerability for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Qualitative Review.
Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Sep;30(3):317-330. doi: 10.1037/cps0000150. Epub 2023 May 18.
6
Obsessive-compulsive existential type: a dialectical-phenomenological approach.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1211598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211598. eCollection 2023.
7
Direct and indirect assessment of perfectionism in patients with depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0270184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270184. eCollection 2022.
9
Predictors of Parental Accommodation and Response Treatment in Young Children With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:737062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737062. eCollection 2021.
10
Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Mar;272(2):313-326. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01284-6. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Ambivalence in the Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Psychopathology. 2015;48(5):349-56. doi: 10.1159/000438676. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 May 30;227(1):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.02.004.
4
Mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder: role of maladaptive beliefs and schemas.
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Feb;65:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
8
An update on the efficacy of psychological therapies in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults.
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2013 Apr 1;2(2):207-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.02.005.
10
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome and moderators.
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验