Suppr超能文献

测试强迫信念在基于互联网的强迫症认知行为疗法中的中介作用:一项随机对照试验的结果

Testing the Mediating Effects of Obsessive Beliefs in Internet-Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Andersson Erik, Ljótsson Brjánn, Hedman Erik, Hesser Hugo, Enander Jesper, Kaldo Viktor, Andersson Gerhard, Lindefors Nils, Rück Christian

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6):722-32. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1931. Epub 2014 Nov 23.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Although cognitive interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been tested in randomized trials, there are few trials that have tested the specific mechanisms of cognitive interventions, i.e. how they achieve their effects. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mediating effects of a short cognitive intervention in the treatment of OCD and used data from a recently conducted randomized controlled trial where 101 participants were allocated to either Internet-based CBT (ICBT) or to a control condition. Obsessive beliefs were measured at pre-treatment, at the time they had received the cognitive intervention, and also at post-treatment. Weekly OCD symptoms were measured throughout the 10 weeks of treatment. We hypothesized that (1) the ICBT group would have greater reductions in obsessive beliefs (controlling for change in OCD symptoms) after completing the cognitive intervention, and that (2) this reduction would, in turn, predict greater OCD symptom reduction throughout the rest of the treatment period. Contrary to our expectations, the longitudinal mediation analysis indicated that (1) being randomized to ICBT actually increased the degree of obsessive beliefs after receiving the cognitive intervention at weeks 1-3, and (2) increase in obsessive beliefs predicted better outcome later in treatment. However, when repeating the analysis using cross-sectional data at post-treatment, the results were in line with the initial hypotheses. Results were replicated when the control condition received ICBT. We conclude that, although obsessive beliefs were significantly reduced at post-treatment for the ICBT group, early increase rather than decrease in obsessive beliefs predicted favourable outcome.

KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE

This study investigated the impact of cognitive interventions on obsessive beliefs for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Results showed that a sudden increase in obsessive beliefs is not an indicator of worse treatment response. On the contrary, it is more likely that the patient is better off when having this sudden increase. Clinicians should not be alarmed if the patient has a sudden increase in obsessive beliefs, but we do recommend the clinician to investigate the reasons for this further.

摘要

未标注

尽管针对强迫症(OCD)的认知干预已在随机试验中进行了测试,但很少有试验对认知干预的具体机制进行测试,即它们是如何产生效果的。在本研究中,我们旨在调查一种简短认知干预在强迫症治疗中的中介作用,并使用了最近一项随机对照试验的数据,该试验将101名参与者分配到基于互联网的认知行为疗法(ICBT)组或对照组。在治疗前、接受认知干预时以及治疗后测量强迫观念。在整个10周的治疗过程中每周测量强迫症症状。我们假设:(1)ICBT组在完成认知干预后,强迫观念的减少幅度会更大(控制强迫症症状的变化);(2)这种减少反过来会预测在治疗剩余期间强迫症症状会有更大程度的减轻。与我们的预期相反,纵向中介分析表明:(1)被随机分配到ICBT组实际上在第1至3周接受认知干预后增加了强迫观念的程度;(2)强迫观念的增加预示着治疗后期会有更好的结果。然而,当使用治疗后的横断面数据重复分析时,结果与最初的假设一致。当对照组接受ICBT时,结果得到了重复。我们得出结论,尽管ICBT组在治疗后强迫观念显著减少,但强迫观念早期增加而非减少预示着良好的结果。

关键从业者信息

本研究调查了认知干预对强迫症患者强迫观念的影响。结果表明,强迫观念的突然增加并非治疗反应不佳的指标。相反,患者出现这种突然增加时情况更可能较好。如果患者的强迫观念突然增加,临床医生不应惊慌,但我们确实建议临床医生进一步调查其原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验