• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经冠状动脉造影证实患有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的不稳定型心绞痛患者的预测试特征。

Pre-test characteristics of unstable angina patients with obstructive coronary artery disease confirmed by coronary angiography.

作者信息

Fladseth Kristina, Kristensen Andreas, Mannsverk Jan, Trovik Thor, Schirmer Henrik

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Division of Cardiothoracic and Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2018 Nov 1;5(2):e000888. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000888. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000888
PMID:30487980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6241968/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients referred for acute coronary angiography (CAG) with unstable angina (UA) have low mortality and low rate of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Better pre-test selection criteria are warranted. We aimed to assess the current guidelines against other clinical variables as predictors of obstructive CAD in patients with UA referred for acute CAG.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2012, all CAGs performed at the University Hospital of North Norway, the sole provider of CAG in the region, were recorded in a registry. We included 979 admissions of UA and retrospectively collected data regarding presenting clinical parameters from patient hospital records. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis and considered prognostically significant if found in the left main stem, proximal LAD or all three main coronary arteries. Characteristics were analysed by logistic regression analysis. A score was developed using ORs from significant factors in a multivariable model.

RESULTS

The overall rate of obstructive CAD was 45%, and the rate of prognostically significant CAD was 11%. The risk criteria recommended in American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.58. Adding clinical information increased the AUC to 0.77 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.80). Applying the derived score, we found that 56% (n=546) of patients had a score of <13, which was associated with a negative predictive value of 95% for prognostic significant CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggest that CAG may be postponed or cancelled in more than half of patients with UA by improving pre-test selection criteria with the addition of clinical parameters to current guidelines.

摘要

目的

因不稳定型心绞痛(UA)接受急性冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者死亡率低,阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)发生率也低。因此需要更好的检查前选择标准。我们旨在评估当前指南与其他临床变量作为因UA接受急性CAG患者阻塞性CAD预测指标的比较。

方法

2005年至2012年期间,挪威北部大学医院(该地区唯一提供CAG的机构)进行的所有CAG均记录在一个登记册中。我们纳入了979例UA患者,并从患者医院记录中回顾性收集了有关呈现的临床参数的数据。阻塞性CAD定义为狭窄≥50%,如果在左主干、近端LAD或所有三支主要冠状动脉中发现,则被认为具有预后意义。通过逻辑回归分析对特征进行分析。使用多变量模型中显著因素的比值比(OR)制定了一个评分。

结果

阻塞性CAD的总体发生率为45%,具有预后意义的CAD发生率为11%。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会和欧洲心脏病学会指南推荐的风险标准曲线下面积(AUC)为0.58。添加临床信息后,AUC增加到0.77(95%CI 0.74至0.80)。应用得出的评分,我们发现56%(n = 546)的患者评分<13,这与具有预后意义的CAD的阴性预测值95%相关。

结论

目前的结果表明,通过在当前指南中添加临床参数来改善检查前选择标准,超过一半的UA患者可能会推迟或取消CAG。

相似文献

1
Pre-test characteristics of unstable angina patients with obstructive coronary artery disease confirmed by coronary angiography.经冠状动脉造影证实患有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的不稳定型心绞痛患者的预测试特征。
Open Heart. 2018 Nov 1;5(2):e000888. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000888. eCollection 2018.
2
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
3
[The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Three case reports].[欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)指南。三例病例报告]
Herz. 2006 Dec;31(9):836-46, 848. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2939-y.
4
Prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with suspected stable angina.疑似稳定性心绞痛患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病预测和预后。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 7;40(18):1426-1435. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy806.
5
Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain.急性胸痛时仅静息状态下的心肌CT灌注成像
South Med J. 2015 Nov;108(11):688-94. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000372.
6
Angiographic extent of coronary artery stenosis in patients with high and intermediate likelihood of unstable angina according to likelihood classification of American Heart Association.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2007 Sep;7(3):287-91.
7
A Newly Defined CHADS-VA Score for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation-A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Persons Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography.一种新定义的CHADS-VA评分用于预测心房颤动患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病——一项针对接受择期冠状动脉造影的老年人的横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 16;11(12):3462. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123462.
8
Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter?有症状女性冠状动脉疾病不同心脏风险评分的比较:女性特异性危险因素重要吗?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1443-50. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494571. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
9
European Society of Cardiology-Recommended Coronary Artery Disease Consortium Pretest Probability Scores More Accurately Predict Obstructive Coronary Disease and Cardiovascular Events Than the Diamond and Forrester Score: The Partners Registry.欧洲心脏病学会推荐的冠状动脉疾病联盟预检概率评分比钻石和福雷斯特评分更准确地预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病和心血管事件:伙伴注册研究。
Circulation. 2016 Jul 19;134(3):201-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023396. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
The importance of characteristics of angina symptoms for the prediction of coronary artery disease in a cohort of stable patients in the modern era.在现代稳定型患者队列中,心绞痛症状特征对预测冠状动脉疾病的重要性。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2019 Jul-Aug;60(4):241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Signaling Pathways (TNF-α-NF-κB, TLR2-TLR4 as well as ROS-MDA) and Cardiac Damages during Cardiac Surgeries (Coronary Stenting, Permanent Pacemaker Implantations, Radiofrequency Ablations).心脏手术(冠状动脉支架置入术、永久性起搏器植入术、射频消融术)期间的信号通路(肿瘤坏死因子-α-核因子-κB、Toll样受体2-Toll样受体4以及活性氧-丙二醛)与心脏损伤
Curr Top Med Chem. 2025;25(2):196-208. doi: 10.2174/0115680266314899240919081451.
2
Unstable Angina: Risk Stratification for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in The Era of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin.不稳定型心绞痛:高敏心肌肌钙蛋白时代下对有显著冠状动脉疾病风险的分层。
Glob Heart. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):7. doi: 10.5334/gh.1286. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials of Long-Term All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed With Routine Invasive Versus Selective Invasive Strategies.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者采用常规侵入性策略与选择性侵入性策略治疗的长期全因死亡率随机试验的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era.支架时代不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的常规侵入性策略与选择性侵入性策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 26;2016(5):CD004815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub4.
3
Prevalence of stable coronary artery disease and its associated clinical factors among patients with chest pain and elevated cardiac troponin alone.
仅胸痛且心肌肌钙蛋白升高患者中稳定型冠状动脉疾病的患病率及其相关临床因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 12;9(4):e15261. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15261. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Reducing Unnecessary Noninvasive Testing for Inpatients With Unstable Angina: The RUNIT Protocol.减少不稳定型心绞痛住院患者的不必要无创检查:RUNIT方案
CJC Open. 2020 Dec 11;3(4):516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.12.004. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Management and outcomes of patients with unstable angina with undetectable, normal, or intermediate hsTnT levels.hsTnT 水平正常或中度升高但无法检测到的不稳定型心绞痛患者的管理和结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Apr;109(4):476-487. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01529-4. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
Consequences of implementing a cardiac troponin assay with improved sensitivity at Swedish coronary care units: an analysis from the SWEDEHEART registry.
在瑞典心脏监护病房实施具有更高灵敏度的心肌肌钙蛋白检测的后果:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 7;37(30):2417-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw029. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Prognostic Value of Undetectable hs Troponin T in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.疑似急性冠脉综合征中检测不到的高敏肌钙蛋白T的预后价值
Am J Med. 2016 Mar;129(3):274-82.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
5
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
6
Implications of Introducing High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Into Clinical Practice: Data From the SWEDEHEART Registry.将高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 引入临床实践的意义:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的数据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 28;65(16):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.044.
7
Prognostic implications of low level cardiac troponin elevation using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T检测低水平心肌肌钙蛋白升高的预后意义
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Apr;38(4):230-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.22379. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014 欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组。由欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献制定。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score.急性冠状动脉疾病患者是否应根据其风险进行分层管理?使用更新后的GRACE风险评分进行推导、外部验证及结果分析。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 21;4(2):e004425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425.