Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗后物理治疗是否有效:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Kangda Road 1, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510230, China.

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Kangda Road 1, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510230, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00664-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy, including percussion, inversion, vibration and combinations, was clinically performed to improve the stone free rate (SFR) following lithotripsy procedures. However, physical therapy is not widely accepted in clinical practice owing to lack of high level evidence support and a standard protocol. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical therapy in improving SFR following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase was performed in March 2019. The efficacy and safety of physical therapy after ESWL and RIRS were assessed by meta-analysis of SFR and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 8 prospective studies with 1065 patients were enrolled. When compared to non-intervention, physical therapy provided a higher SFR (OR:3.38, 95% CI: 2.45-4.66, p < 0.0001) at all time points (week 1, week 2 and month 1), while there was no significant difference in complications such as hematuria, lumbago, dizziness and urinary tract infection (OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62-1.13; p = 0.237). In subgroup analysis of different stone locations, lower calyx stone (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 2.21-5.55; p < 0.0001), upper ureter and renal pelvic stones (OR:2.79; 95%CI:1.62-4.81; p = 0.0002) had a higher SFR after physical therapy, while there was no significant improvement in SFR in upper and middle calyx stones. In subgroup analysis of different techniques, EPVL (external physical vibration lithecbole, OR:3.47; 95%CI:2.24-5.37; p < 0.0001) and PDI (percussion, diuresis and inversion, OR:3.24; 95%CI:2.01-5.21; p < 0.0001) were both effective in improving SFR when compared to non-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical therapy is effective in improving the SFR after ESWL and RIRS, especially for lower calyx stones, upper ureter and renal pelvic stones, while without significant side effects. External physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) might provide a relative uniformed and repeatable protocol for clinical practice of physical therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228 .

摘要

背景

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)和经皮肾镜取石术(RIRS)后,临床常采用物理治疗(包括叩击、倒置、振动和联合治疗)来提高结石清除率(SFR)。然而,由于缺乏高级别证据支持和标准方案,物理治疗在临床实践中并未得到广泛认可。本荟萃分析旨在评估 ESWL 和 RIRS 后物理治疗对提高 SFR 的疗效和安全性。

方法

2019 年 3 月对 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 中的文献进行了系统性综述。通过荟萃分析 SFR 和并发症发生率来评估 ESWL 和 RIRS 后物理治疗的疗效和安全性。

结果

共纳入 8 项前瞻性研究,共 1065 例患者。与非干预组相比,物理治疗在所有时间点(第 1 周、第 2 周和第 1 个月)的 SFR 更高(OR:3.38,95%CI:2.45-4.66,p<0.0001),而血尿、腰痛、头晕和尿路感染等并发症发生率无显著差异(OR:0.84;95%CI:0.62-1.13;p=0.237)。在不同结石位置的亚组分析中,下盏结石(OR:3.51;95%CI:2.21-5.55;p<0.0001)、上输尿管和肾盂结石(OR:2.79;95%CI:1.62-4.81;p=0.0002)的 SFR 更高,而上、中盏结石的 SFR 无显著改善。在不同技术的亚组分析中,与非干预组相比,EPVL(体外物理振动碎石术,OR:3.47;95%CI:2.24-5.37;p<0.0001)和 PDI(叩击、利尿和倒置,OR:3.24;95%CI:2.01-5.21;p<0.0001)均能有效提高 SFR。

结论

物理治疗可有效提高 ESWL 和 RIRS 后的 SFR,特别是对下盏结石、上输尿管和肾盂结石,且无明显副作用。体外物理振动碎石术(EPVL)可能为物理治疗的临床实践提供一个相对统一和可重复的方案。

试验注册

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验