Berdouses E D, Oulis C J, Michalaki M, Tripoliti E E, Fotiadis D I
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
EAPD, 22 Kodrou str Halandri, 15231, Athens, Greece.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Jun;20(3):249-255. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0389-x. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
To compare the diagnostic performance of the automated caries detection system (ACDS) for the detection and diagnosis of occlusal caries with the histological appearance of the lesions.
Eighteen posterior permanent teeth were used, out of which 40 sections were made and 53 areas were evaluated. Teeth with hypoplastic and/or hypomineralised areas or sealants on the occlusal surfaces were excluded from the study. The teeth that were used for this study were a subgroup of the teeth used in the study that introduced ACDS system. This subgroup consisted of teeth having in their occlusal surfaces early carious lesions classified as international caries detection and scoring system (ICDAS) 0, 1, 2 and 3 after clinical examination by the examiners. Histological preparations were classified by experienced examiners based on the Ekstrand, Ricketts and Kidd (ERK) system and for the respective occlusal surfaces by the ACDS system based on ICDAS II system. There were two threshold limits considered as carious in either system ICDAS ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 and ERK index ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 and all possible combinations were analysed. Statistical methods of weighted version of kappa coefficient, Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient and p-values using the Fisher's exact method were used at the confidence level of 0.05.
Intra-examiner kappa coefficient agreement was 0.87 and 0.89 while the inter-examiner for the two trials were 0.87 and 0.92. The ICDAS3-ERK3 combination between the ACDS and histological sections presented the best agreement with kappa coefficient 0.76, agreement 92.5%, sensitivity 100% and specificity 91.1%. ICDAS3-ERK3 combination between the optical examination of the examiners compared to the histological preparations showed kappa coefficient 0.87, agreement 96.2%, sensitivity 100%, Specificity 95.6%.
The evidence supports the view that ACDS classification of occlusal surfaces based on the ICDAS system are comparable with classification to that of an examiner and with the histology of the lesion. The use of ACDS has the distinct advantage though of removing the subjectivity of the examiner since it performs the classification without any intervention by him.
比较自动龋病检测系统(ACDS)对咬合面龋病的检测和诊断性能与病变的组织学表现。
使用18颗后牙恒牙,制作了40个切片并评估了53个区域。研究排除了咬合面有发育不全和/或矿化不足区域或有封闭剂的牙齿。本研究使用的牙齿是引入ACDS系统的研究中所用牙齿的一个亚组。该亚组由检查者临床检查后咬合面有早期龋损的牙齿组成,这些龋损根据国际龋病检测与评分系统(ICDAS)分为0、1、2和3级。组织学切片由经验丰富的检查者根据埃克斯特兰德、里基茨和基德(ERK)系统进行分类,ACDS系统则根据ICDAS II系统对相应的咬合面进行分类。在两个系统中,均将ICDAS≥2或≥3以及ERK指数≥2或≥3视为龋病的两个阈值,并分析了所有可能的组合。采用加权版kappa系数、肯德尔tau-b相关系数的统计方法以及使用费舍尔精确检验法计算p值,置信水平为0.05。
检查者内kappa系数一致性分别为0.87和0.89,而两次试验的检查者间一致性分别为0.87和0.92。ACDS与组织学切片之间的ICDAS3-ERK3组合呈现出最佳一致性,kappa系数为0.76,一致性为92.5%,敏感性为100%,特异性为91.1%。与组织学切片相比,检查者的光学检查之间的ICDAS3-ERK组合显示kappa系数为0.87,一致性为96.2%,敏感性为100%,特异性为95.6%。
有证据支持这样的观点,即基于ICDAS系统的ACDS对咬合面的分类与检查者的分类以及病变的组织学分类具有可比性。不过,使用ACDS具有明显优势,可以消除检查者的主观性,因为它在没有检查者任何干预的情况下进行分类。