Suppr超能文献

狼疮性肾炎的联合免疫抑制治疗(CIST):一项多中心、随机对照研究。

Combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) in lupus nephritis: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.

Department of Rheumatology, China Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;38(4):1047-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4368-8. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The standard strategy for treating lupus nephritis comprises glucocorticoids together with either intravenous cyclophosphamide or oral mycophenolate mofetil, but the low remission rate is still a challenge in practice. This study was aimed to seek higher remission rate of lupus nephritis using a combined strategy.

METHOD

A 24-week trial was conducted in 17 rheumatology or nephrology centers in China. A total of 191 lupus nephritis patients were randomized to follow a combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) with intravenous cyclophosphamide, an oral immunosuppressive agent, namely mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine or leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine (n = 95), or receive intravenous cyclophosphamide alone (n = 96) for 24 weeks. Glucocorticoid was given to both groups. The primary end point was a complete remission with a most stringent standard as proteinuria < 150 mg per 24 h, normal urinary sediment, serum albumin, and renal function at 24 weeks. The secondary end point was treatment failure at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At week 24, both the rate of complete remission (39.5%) and total response (87.2%) was higher in the combined group, compared with CYC group (20.8% and 68.8%, p < 0.05). The cumulative probability of complete remission was also higher in the combined group (p = 0.013). In addition, the combined treatment was superior to routine CYC with less treatment failure (12.8% vs.31.2%, p < 0.001). No difference was found between the incidences of severe adverse events in the two arms: 3.2% (3/95 combined group) vs.4.2% (4/96 CYC group).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a combined immunosuppressive agent is superior to routine CYC only therapy in lupus nephritis.

摘要

目的

治疗狼疮肾炎的标准策略包括糖皮质激素联合静脉注射环磷酰胺或口服吗替麦考酚酯,但缓解率低仍然是实践中的一个挑战。本研究旨在寻求狼疮肾炎更高的缓解率。

方法

在中国 17 个风湿病或肾脏病中心进行了一项 24 周的试验。共有 191 例狼疮肾炎患者被随机分为联合免疫抑制治疗(CIST)组(n=95)和环磷酰胺静脉注射组(n=96)。CIST 组给予静脉注射环磷酰胺、口服免疫抑制剂(吗替麦考酚酯、硫唑嘌呤或来氟米特)和羟氯喹,CIST 组同时给予糖皮质激素。主要终点是 24 周时达到最严格标准的完全缓解,即蛋白尿<150mg/24h、尿沉渣正常、血清白蛋白和肾功能正常。次要终点是 24 周时治疗失败。

结果

第 24 周时,联合组的完全缓解率(39.5%)和总缓解率(87.2%)均高于环磷酰胺组(20.8%和 68.8%,p<0.05)。联合组的完全缓解累积概率也更高(p=0.013)。此外,联合治疗在减少治疗失败方面优于常规环磷酰胺治疗(12.8% vs.31.2%,p<0.001)。两组严重不良事件发生率无差异:联合组 3.2%(3/95),环磷酰胺组 4.2%(4/96)。

结论

联合免疫抑制剂治疗优于常规环磷酰胺治疗狼疮肾炎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验