Hvid I
Biomechanics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Hospital, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Dan Med Bull. 1988 Aug;35(4):345-65.
Interest in the biomechanical properties of trabecular bone has expanded in response to the problems related to total and partial joint replacement with the knee joint constituting a main focus of attention. This relatively recent development has left a number of fundamental problems unanswered, especially related to the machining, storage and testing of trabecular bone specimens. Nevertheless, these studies have contributed to the understanding of the mechanical function of trabecular bone. Regarding the role of trabecular bone at the knee joint, the following conclusions may be emphasized (conclusions drawn from the author's previous studies (I-X) are shown in italics): (1) Trabecular bone is almost exclusively responsible for the transmission of load at the proximal tibial epiphysis from the knee joint to the metaphysis. The peripheral shell surrounding the epiphysis is not composed of cortical bone and plays a negligible role in load transmission. (2) The compressive strength and stiffness of trabecular bone is primarily dependent upon the apparent density, trabecular architecture and the strength of the bone material. Direct and indirect sources suggest that the true material strength of trabecular bone is less than that of cortical bone. The epiphyseal trabecular architecture, featuring a marked polarity with alignment of primary trabeculae at right angles to the joint surface, is responsible for functional anisotropy which points to the axial compressive properties as the more important mechanical parameters. (3) Tensile and shear properties are of special relevance to mechanical loosening of implants. These properties may be derived from the apparent density, and a close empirical relation to the axial compressive strength and stiffness is suggested. (4) The foam-like structure of trabecular bone is the basis for the large energy absorptive capacity. (5) The pattern of axial compressive stiffness and strength at the normal proximal tibia differs little among individuals. Supporting the medial tibial plateau is a large high strength area with maximal strength centrally and slightly anteriorly, while laterally there is a restricted area of relatively high strength posteriorly with a lower maximal value than medially. Bone strength is significantly reduced within ten millimeters of the subchondral bone plate, and this reduction continues distally at the lateral condyle. At both condyles strength is reduced towards the periphery with very low values being obtained at the margins of the condyles and at the intercondylar region. Absolute bone strength values are influenced by the level of physical activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
由于全膝关节置换和部分膝关节置换相关问题的出现,对松质骨生物力学特性的研究兴趣不断扩大,膝关节成为主要关注焦点。这一相对较新的发展留下了一些基本问题未得到解答,尤其是与松质骨标本的加工、储存和测试相关的问题。尽管如此,这些研究有助于人们对松质骨力学功能的理解。关于松质骨在膝关节中的作用,可强调以下结论(作者先前研究(I - X)得出的结论用斜体表示):(1)松质骨几乎完全负责在胫骨近端骨骺处将膝关节的负荷传递至干骺端。骨骺周围的外周壳并非由皮质骨构成,在负荷传递中作用可忽略不计。(2)松质骨的抗压强度和刚度主要取决于表观密度、小梁结构和骨材料强度。直接和间接证据表明,松质骨的真实材料强度低于皮质骨。骨骺小梁结构具有明显的极性,初级小梁与关节面成直角排列,导致功能各向异性,轴向压缩特性是更重要的力学参数。(3)拉伸和剪切特性与植入物的机械松动特别相关。这些特性可能源自表观密度,并且与轴向抗压强度和刚度存在密切的经验关系。(4)松质骨的泡沫状结构是其具有较大能量吸收能力的基础。(5)正常胫骨近端的轴向压缩刚度和强度模式在个体间差异不大。支撑内侧胫骨平台的是一个大的高强度区域,最大强度位于中央且稍靠前,而外侧有一个受限区域,相对高强度位于后方,最大值低于内侧。在软骨下骨板内10毫米范围内骨强度显著降低,并且在外侧髁向远端延续。在两个髁处,强度向周边降低,在髁边缘和髁间区域获得的值非常低。绝对骨强度值受身体活动水平影响。(摘要截断于400字)