Jung E G, Bisco A, Azzollini E, Sartani A, Ruffmann R
Hautklinik der Fakultät für Klinische Medizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, BRD.
Dermatologica. 1988;177(2):104-8. doi: 10.1159/000248524.
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was undertaken in 41 patients with dermatomycosis to compare topical 2% fenticonazole cream (group A: 21 patients) with topical 1% bifonazole cream (group B: 20 patients). Treatment was performed as a once daily application. Mycological and clinical parameters were assessed before treatment and after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. At the control visits the clinical investigator also expressed an overall judgement on the patient's state of disease. This parameter was based on a combined clinical and mycological assessment by the physician; laboratory screening investigations were undertaken before and at the end of treatments. All patients were checked for their state of disease 3-4 weeks after the end of treatment. All assessment criteria showed fenticonazole to be at least as efficacious as bifonazole. Several trends in favor of fenticonazole were also found: fenticonazole achieved superior results in the overall clinical evaluation, and after 3 weeks of treatment 15 patients out of 21 on fenticonazole were cured in mycological and clinical terms, whereas treatment with bifonazole resulted in complete healing of only 7 patients out of 20. This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.021) and indicates a more rapid therapeutic activity of fenticonazole. At the posttreatment rechecks no recurrent disease was registered, irrespective of whether patients had received fenticonazole or bifonazole. Laboratory screening investigations revealed no evidence of significant treatment-related changes or abnormalities in both treatments. No adverse events were noted for either treatment.
对41例皮肤真菌病患者进行了一项随机双盲临床试验,以比较局部使用2%联苯苄唑乳膏(A组:21例患者)和局部使用1%联苯苄唑乳膏(B组:20例患者)的疗效。治疗方式为每日用药一次。在治疗前以及治疗7、14、21和28天后评估真菌学和临床参数。在对照访视时,临床研究者还对患者的疾病状态给出总体判断。该参数基于医生对临床和真菌学的综合评估;在治疗前和治疗结束时进行实验室筛查检查。在治疗结束后3 - 4周对所有患者的疾病状态进行检查。所有评估标准均显示联苯苄唑的疗效至少与联苯苄唑相当。还发现了一些有利于联苯苄唑的趋势:在总体临床评估中联苯苄唑取得了更好的结果,并且在治疗3周后,使用联苯苄唑治疗的21例患者中有15例在真菌学和临床方面治愈,而使用联苯苄唑治疗的20例患者中只有7例完全治愈。这种差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.021),表明联苯苄唑具有更快的治疗活性。在治疗后复查中,无论患者接受的是联苯苄唑还是联苯苄唑治疗,均未发现疾病复发。实验室筛查检查显示,两种治疗均未出现与治疗相关的显著变化或异常迹象。两种治疗均未观察到不良事件。