Reinhard Selten Laboratory, China Academy of Corporate Governance, Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Department of Economic and Management, Nankai University Binhai College, Tianjin, China.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):59-71. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy106.
Decision makers often follow other similarly situated people in making decisions, creating a sequential decision-making context. Although rational behavior is often to make the same choice as previous decision makers, which can result in an information cascade, people may assign inappropriately higher weight to their own private information and discount public information about predecessors' choices. Recent findings suggest that overweighting private information may be associated with increased activities in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). In the present study, we employed transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and developed a computational model to examine the causal relationship between right IFG (rIFG) and overweighting private information. Specifically, we applied three types of tDCS over rIFG while participants were completing a sequential decision-making task. Our results showed that anodal stimulation significantly increased the weight given to private information and decreased the response time in making a decision when private information conflicted with public information, but cathodal stimulation did not have such impacts. Importantly, the effect of anodal stimulation was significant in some conditions when information conflict or task difficulty reached a threshold that might trigger cognitive control-related processes. Our findings revealed the important role of rIFG in trade-off between considering private and public information during sequential decision-making.
决策者在做决策时经常会跟随其他情况相似的人,从而形成连续的决策环境。虽然理性行为通常是做出与之前决策者相同的选择,这可能导致信息级联,但人们可能会不恰当地对自己的私人信息赋予更高的权重,并对前人选择的公共信息进行折扣。最近的研究结果表明,过度重视私人信息可能与下额叶回(IFG)活动增加有关。在本研究中,我们采用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)并开发了一个计算模型来检验右侧 IFG(rIFG)与过度重视私人信息之间的因果关系。具体来说,我们在参与者完成连续决策任务时,在 rIFG 上施加了三种类型的 tDCS。我们的结果表明,当私人信息与公共信息冲突时,阳极刺激会显著增加对私人信息的重视程度,并减少决策时的反应时间,但阴极刺激则没有这种影响。重要的是,当信息冲突或任务难度达到可能引发认知控制相关过程的阈值时,阳极刺激的效果在某些条件下是显著的。我们的研究结果揭示了 rIFG 在连续决策中权衡考虑私人信息和公共信息方面的重要作用。