Dea Nicolas, Fisher Charles G, Reynolds Jeremy J, Schwab Joseph H, Rhines Laurence D, Gokaslan Ziya L, Bettegowda Chetan, Sahgal Arjun, Lazáry Áron, Luzzati Alessandro, Boriani Stefano, Gasbarrini Alessandro, Laufer Ilya, Charest-Morin Raphaële, Wei Feng, Teixeira William, Germscheid Niccole M, Hornicek Francis J, DeLaney Thomas F, Shin John H
1Division of Spine Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital and The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
2Oxford Spinal Unit, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct 19;30(1):119-125. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.SPINE18362. Print 2019 Jan 1.
OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to investigate the spectrum of current treatment protocols for managing newly diagnosed chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum.METHODSA survey on the treatment of spinal chordoma was distributed electronically to members of the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor, including neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and radiation oncologists from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Survey participants were pre-identified clinicians from centers with expertise in the treatment of spinal tumors. The suvey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.RESULTSThirty-nine of 43 (91%) participants completed the survey. Most (80%) indicated that they favor en bloc resection without preoperative neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) when en bloc resection is feasible with acceptable morbidity. The main area of disagreement was with the role of postoperative RT, where 41% preferred giving RT only if positive margins were achieved and 38% preferred giving RT irrespective of margin status. When en bloc resection would result in significant morbidity, 33% preferred planned intralesional resection followed by RT, and 33% preferred giving neoadjuvant RT prior to surgery. In total, 8 treatment protocols were identified: 3 in which en bloc resection is feasible with acceptable morbidity and 5 in which en bloc resection would result in significant morbidity.CONCLUSIONSThe results confirm that there is treatment variability across centers worldwide for managing newly diagnosed chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum. This information will be used to design an international prospective cohort study to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with spinal chordoma.
目的
本研究旨在调查当前用于治疗新诊断的活动脊柱和骶骨脊索瘤的治疗方案范围。
方法
一项关于脊柱脊索瘤治疗的调查以电子方式分发给AOSpine知识论坛肿瘤学成员,包括来自北美、南美、欧洲、亚洲和澳大利亚的神经外科医生、骨科医生和放射肿瘤学家。调查参与者是来自具有脊柱肿瘤治疗专业知识中心的预先确定的临床医生。使用描述性统计分析调查回复。
结果
43名参与者中有39名(91%)完成了调查。大多数(80%)表示,当整块切除可行且发病率可接受时,他们倾向于在不进行术前新辅助放疗(RT)的情况下进行整块切除。主要的分歧领域在于术后放疗的作用,41%的人倾向于仅在切缘阳性时给予放疗,38%的人倾向于无论切缘状态如何都给予放疗。当整块切除会导致显著的发病率时,33%的人倾向于计划进行瘤内切除后放疗,33%的人倾向于在手术前给予新辅助放疗。总共确定了8种治疗方案:3种整块切除可行且发病率可接受,5种整块切除会导致显著的发病率。
结论
结果证实,全球各中心在治疗新诊断的活动脊柱和骶骨脊索瘤方面存在治疗差异。这些信息将用于设计一项国际前瞻性队列研究,以确定脊柱脊索瘤患者最合适的治疗策略。