School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e024228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024228.
There is considerable variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England. The aim was to explore variation in how each ambulance service addressed non-conveyance for calls ending in telephone advice and discharge at scene.
A qualitative interview study.
Ten large regional ambulance services covering 99% of the population in England.
Between four and seven interviewees from each ambulance service including managers, paramedics and healthcare commissioners, totalling 49 interviews.
Telephone semistructured interviews.
The way interviewees in each ambulance service discussed non-conveyance within their organisation varied for three broad themes. First, ambulance service senior management appeared to set the culture around non-conveyance within an organisation, viewing it either as an opportunity or as a risky endeavour. Although motivation levels to undertake non-conveyance did not appear to be directly affected by the stability of an ambulance service in terms of continuity of leadership and externally assessed quality, this stability could affect the ability of the organisation to innovate to increase non-conveyance rates. Second, descriptions of workforce configuration differed between ambulance services, as well as how this workforce was used, trained and valued. Third, interviewees in each ambulance service described health and social care in the wider emergency and urgent care system differently in terms of availability of services that could facilitate non-conveyance, the amount of collaborative working between health and social care services and the ambulance service and complexity related to the numbers of services and healthcare commissioners with whom they had to work.
This study suggests that factors within and outside the control of ambulance services may contribute to variation in non-conveyance rates. These findings can be tested in a quantitative analysis of factors affecting variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England.
英国各救护车服务机构之间的非转运率存在相当大的差异。本研究旨在探讨每个救护车服务机构在电话咨询和现场出院的呼叫中处理非转运的方式。
定性访谈研究。
覆盖英格兰 99%人口的 10 个大型区域救护车服务机构。
每个救护车服务机构有 4 至 7 名受访者参加,包括管理人员、护理人员和医疗保健专员,共进行了 49 次访谈。
电话半结构式访谈。
每个救护车服务机构的受访者在其组织内讨论非转运的方式因三个广泛的主题而有所不同。首先,救护车服务的高级管理层似乎在组织内部设定了非转运的文化,将其视为机会或有风险的尝试。尽管非转运的动机水平似乎不会直接受到救护车服务在领导层的连续性和外部评估的质量方面的稳定性的影响,但这种稳定性可能会影响组织创新以提高非转运率的能力。其次,救护车服务之间的劳动力配置描述以及如何使用、培训和重视劳动力存在差异。第三,每个救护车服务的受访者根据能够促进非转运的服务的可用性、卫生和社会保健服务之间的协作程度以及与他们合作的服务和医疗保健专员的数量,描述了更广泛的紧急和紧急护理系统中的卫生和社会保健情况,描述方式有所不同。
本研究表明,救护车服务机构内部和外部的因素可能导致非转运率的差异。这些发现可以在对英格兰救护车服务机构之间非转运率差异的影响因素进行定量分析中进行检验。