Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;15(2):77-90. doi: 10.1038/s41584-018-0123-4.
Intra-articular drug delivery has a number of advantages over systemic administration; however, for the past 20 years, intra-articular treatment options for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been limited to analgesics, glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid (HA) and a small number of unproven alternative therapies. Although HA and glucocorticoids can provide clinically meaningful benefits to an appreciable number of patients, emerging evidence indicates that the apparent effectiveness of these treatments is largely a result of other factors, including the placebo effect. Biologic drugs that target inflammatory processes are used to manage rheumatoid arthritis, but have not translated well into use in OA. A lack of high-level evidence and methodological limitations hinder our understanding of so-called 'stem' cell therapies and, although the off-label administration of intra-articular cell therapies (such as platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate) is common, high-quality clinical data are needed before these treatments can be recommended. A number of promising intra-articular treatments are currently in clinical development in the United States, including small-molecule and biologic therapies, devices and gene therapies. Although the prospect of new, non-surgical treatments for OA is exciting, the benefits of new treatments must be carefully weighed against their costs and potential risks.
关节内药物输送相对于全身给药有许多优势;然而,在过去的 20 年中,关节内治疗膝关节骨关节炎 (OA) 的选择仅限于镇痛药、糖皮质激素、透明质酸 (HA) 和少数未经证实的替代疗法。尽管 HA 和糖皮质激素可以为相当数量的患者提供有临床意义的益处,但新出现的证据表明,这些治疗方法的明显效果在很大程度上是其他因素的结果,包括安慰剂效应。针对炎症过程的生物药物用于治疗类风湿关节炎,但在 OA 中的应用效果不佳。缺乏高水平的证据和方法学限制阻碍了我们对所谓的“干细胞”疗法的理解,尽管关节内细胞疗法(如富含血小板的血浆和骨髓抽吸浓缩物)的标签外给药很常见,但在推荐这些治疗方法之前,需要高质量的临床数据。目前,包括小分子和生物疗法、设备和基因疗法在内的许多有前途的关节内治疗方法正在美国进行临床开发。虽然 OA 的新非手术治疗方法前景令人兴奋,但必须仔细权衡新治疗方法的益处与其成本和潜在风险。