Department of Management, Business Administration Faculty, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, No. 744, Sura Narai Road, Mueang District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, 30000, Thailand.
Department of Industrial Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, No. 1 Hseuh-Fu Road, Neipu, Pingtung, 912, Taiwan.
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Nov 29;190(12):748. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7113-5.
The concept of green manufacturing is emerging as a means of enhancing a firm's competitiveness through intelligent systems and process improvement to eliminate adverse effects on the environment. However, environmental performance (EPA) is challenging from the decision-making perspective because of difficulty determining and prioritising the proper factors that have significant effect on a firm's EPA. This study was conducted with the objective of enhancing the effectiveness of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assess EPA by integrating exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factory analysis to validate suitable criteria and sub-criteria. A questionnaire survey was employed as a tool to collect data from 341 managers of Thailand and Taiwan's food industry and the AHP approach used for normalisation, ranking, and simulation of sensitivity analysis. The results obtained indicate that quality policy, quality assurance, and quality control, respectively, are the three most important factors in the measurement of EPA, whereas organisational support in innovativeness is assigned the lowest priority. Based on simulations for sensitivity analysis, the results can be applied to guide managers' decisions in the course of steering their firms towards sustainable manufacturing.
绿色制造的概念正在兴起,它通过智能系统和流程改进来提高企业的竞争力,以消除对环境的不利影响。然而,从决策的角度来看,环境绩效(EPA)具有挑战性,因为难以确定和优先考虑对企业 EPA 有重大影响的适当因素。本研究旨在通过整合探索性因素分析和验证性工厂分析来验证合适的标准和子标准,从而提高层次分析法(AHP)评估 EPA 的有效性。问卷调查被用作从泰国和中国台湾地区食品行业的 341 名经理那里收集数据的工具,采用层次分析法进行归一化、排名和敏感性分析模拟。结果表明,质量政策、质量保证和质量控制分别是 EPA 衡量的三个最重要因素,而创新性的组织支持则被赋予最低优先级。基于敏感性分析的模拟,结果可用于指导管理人员在引导企业走向可持续制造的过程中的决策。