• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

T1b 期胆囊癌外科分期全国性失败。

National Failure of Surgical Staging for T1b Gallbladder Cancer.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Christus Trinity Mother Frances Hospital, Tyler, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):604-610. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7064-7. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-7064-7
PMID:30499077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend radical cholecystectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (RC-RL) for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, the extent to which these guidelines are followed is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate current surgical practices for T1b GBC and their implications for overall management strategies and associated outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated patients identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2012) with non-metastatic T1b GBC. The patients were categorized according to type of surgical treatment received: simple cholecystectomy (SC) or RC-RL. Among the patients who had lymph nodes pathologically examined, nodal status was classified as pN- or pN+. Use of any adjuvant therapy was ascertained. Overall survival (OS) was compared based on type of surgical treatment and nodal status.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 464 patients (247 SC and 217 RC-RL cases). The positive margin status did not differ between the two groups (6.1% for SC vs 2.3% for RC-RL; p = 0.128). For RC-RL, the pN+ rate was 15%. Adjuvant therapies were used more frequently in pN+ (53.1% vs 9.4% for pN-). By comparison, 10.9% of the SC patients received adjuvant therapy. The OS for RC-RL-pN- (5-years OS, 64.4%) was significantly better than for RC-RL-pN+ (5-years OS, 15.7%) or SC (5-years OS, 48.3%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Less than 50% of the patients with a T1b GBC primary tumor undergo the recommended surgical treatment. Given that 15% of these patients have nodal metastasis and in light of the previously described benefits of adjuvant therapy for node positive GBC, failure to perform RC-RL risks incomplete staging and thus undertreatment for patients with T1b GBC.

摘要

背景

目前的指南建议对 T1b 期胆囊癌(GBC)患者行根治性胆囊切除术加区域淋巴结清扫术(RC-RL)。然而,这些指南的实施程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 T1b GBC 的当前手术治疗方法及其对整体管理策略和相关结局的影响。

方法

本回顾性队列研究调查了国家癌症数据库(2004-2012 年)中诊断为非转移性 T1b GBC 的患者。根据接受的手术治疗类型将患者分为单纯胆囊切除术(SC)或 RC-RL。对接受病理检查淋巴结的患者,淋巴结状态分为 pN-或 pN+。确定是否使用任何辅助治疗。根据手术治疗类型和淋巴结状态比较总生存期(OS)。

结果

该队列包括 464 名患者(SC 组 247 例,RC-RL 组 217 例)。两组的阳性切缘状态无差异(SC 组为 6.1%,RC-RL 组为 2.3%;p=0.128)。对于 RC-RL,pN+的比例为 15%。pN+患者更常使用辅助治疗(53.1%比 pN-患者的 9.4%)。相比之下,10.9%的 SC 患者接受了辅助治疗。RC-RL-pN-(5 年 OS,64.4%)的 OS 明显优于 RC-RL-pN+(5 年 OS,15.7%)或 SC(5 年 OS,48.3%)(p<0.001)。

结论

不到 50%的 T1b GBC 患者接受了推荐的手术治疗。鉴于这些患者中有 15%存在淋巴结转移,且先前描述的淋巴结阳性 GBC 辅助治疗获益,RC-RL 未实施会导致分期不完整,从而对 T1b GBC 患者治疗不足。

相似文献

1
National Failure of Surgical Staging for T1b Gallbladder Cancer.T1b 期胆囊癌外科分期全国性失败。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):604-610. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7064-7. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Simple cholecystectomy is an adequate treatment for grade I T1bN0M0 gallbladder carcinoma: Evidence from 528 patients.单纯胆囊切除术治疗Ⅰ期 T1bN0M0 胆囊癌是足够的:来自 528 例患者的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 21;28(31):4431-4441. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4431.
3
Long-term outcomes of surgical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: an institutional evaluation.T1b 期胆囊癌行手术切除的长期疗效:一项机构评估。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6507-2.
4
Survival benefits of simple versus extended cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (2004 to 2013).单纯胆囊切除术与扩大胆囊切除术及淋巴结清扫术对T1b期胆囊癌患者的生存获益:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2004年至2013年)分析
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(11):3668-3679. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2989. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
A 21-year analysis of stage I gallbladder carcinoma: is cholecystectomy alone adequate?一期胆囊癌 21 年分析:单纯胆囊切除术是否足够?
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jan;15(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00559.x. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
6
What is the better choice for T1b gallbladder cancer: simple versus extended cholecystectomy.对于T1b期胆囊癌,单纯胆囊切除术与扩大胆囊切除术哪种选择更好?
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3222-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2713-x.
7
Optimal extent of surgery for early gallbladder cancer with regard to long-term survival: a meta-analysis.关于长期生存的早期胆囊癌手术的最佳范围:一项荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Feb;25(2):131-141. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.521. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Prognostic significance of regional lymphadenectomy in T1b gallbladder cancer: Results from 24 hospitals in China.T1b期胆囊癌区域淋巴结清扫术的预后意义:来自中国24家医院的结果
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Feb 27;13(2):176-186. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.176.
9
[A multicenter retrospective study for the prognosis of T1b stage gallbladder carcinoma underwent different surgical procedure].[一项关于接受不同手术方式的T1b期胆囊癌预后的多中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 1;56(5):355-359. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.05.007.
10
Adjuvant Therapy Use for Patients With Inadequately Resected T1b-T3 Gallbladder Cancer.辅助治疗在 T1b-T3 期胆囊癌未完全切除患者中的应用。
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.034. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of simple vs. extended cholecystectomy on prognosis of T1b gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯胆囊切除术与扩大胆囊切除术对T1b期胆囊癌预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2025 May 26;12:1477301. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1477301. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of nodal staging and risk factors for nodal involvement in gallbladder cancer.胆囊癌淋巴结分期及淋巴结受累危险因素的评估
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf056.
3
Surgical Technique of Laparoscopic Whole-Layer Cholecystectomy for Suspected Early Gallbladder Cancer: A Safe and Minimally Invasive Approach.
疑似早期胆囊癌的腹腔镜全层胆囊切除术的手术技术:一种安全且微创的方法。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 23;17(4):e82873. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82873. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
De-escalating surgical treatment in low stage gallbladder cancer.降低低分期胆囊癌的手术治疗强度
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):1038-1040. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-576. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
5
Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC.胆囊癌的危险因素与预后因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 18;13(14):4201. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144201.
6
Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of gallbladder cancer: a case report.细胞减灭术联合腹腔内热化疗及术中放射治疗在胆囊癌治疗中的应用:1例病例报告
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 3;14:1361017. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1361017. eCollection 2024.
7
Referral rate of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer and survival: outcomes of a multicentre retrospective study.偶然发现的胆囊癌患者的转诊率和生存率:一项多中心回顾性研究的结果。
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae013.
8
Gallbladder cancer: current and future treatment options.胆囊癌:当前及未来的治疗选择
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 11;14:1183619. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1183619. eCollection 2023.
9
Reappraisal of T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC): clinicopathologic analysis of 473 in situ and invasive GBCs and critical review of the literature highlights its rarity, and that it has a very good prognosis.T1b 期胆囊癌(GBC)再评估:473 例原位和浸润性 GBC 的临床病理分析,并对文献进行批判性回顾,强调其罕见性和极佳的预后。
Virchows Arch. 2023 Feb;482(2):311-323. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03482-6. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
Robotic versus open extended cholecystectomy for T1a-T3 gallbladder cancer: A matched comparison.机器人辅助与开放扩大胆囊切除术治疗T1a-T3期胆囊癌:一项配对比较研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 7;9:1039828. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1039828. eCollection 2022.