Sundling Kaitlin E, Kurtycz Daniel F I
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Jan;47(1):53-63. doi: 10.1002/dc.24103. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
There has been increasing pressure for systemization in cytopathology. Lack of uniformity in categorization, variation in opinion based regional practice, and technologic advancement have created an environment disposed toward creation of more consistent evidence-based approaches to diagnostic problems. This review provides an overview of the major standardized terminology systems in cytology, with historical perspectives and commentary on current uses of these systems. These systems now include gynecologic, thyroid, pancreaticobiliary, urinary, salivary gland, and breast cytology. We summarize major classification systems supported by national and international professional organizations, outlining the structure and goals of each system. Specific benefits and potential pitfalls in the implementation of each system are given. Finally, we address potential criticisms of standardized terminology systems and proposed future directions to continue the evolution of standardized terminology to improve clinical practice.
细胞病理学领域对系统化的压力与日俱增。分类缺乏一致性、基于地区实践的观点差异以及技术进步营造了一种环境,促使人们创建更一致的基于证据的诊断问题解决方法。本综述概述了细胞学中主要的标准化术语系统,介绍了其历史背景并对这些系统的当前应用进行了评论。这些系统目前涵盖妇科、甲状腺、胰胆管、泌尿、唾液腺和乳腺细胞学。我们总结了得到国家和国际专业组织支持的主要分类系统,概述了每个系统的结构和目标。阐述了每个系统实施过程中的具体益处和潜在问题。最后,我们回应了对标准化术语系统的潜在批评,并提出了未来的发展方向,以推动标准化术语不断演变,从而改善临床实践。