• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镫骨活动度过高作为听觉过敏的一个可能原因。

Stapes hypermobility as a possible cause of hyperacusis.

作者信息

Silverstein Herbert, Smith Joshua, Kellermeyer Brian

机构信息

Ear Research Foundation, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America.

Ear Research Foundation, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.018
PMID:30502003
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hyperacusis is a reduction of normal tolerances for everyday sounds. Although several publications have been produced demonstrating that minimally invasive surgical procedures may improve patient symptoms, the precise etiology of hyperacusis often remains elusive. This study describes 21 patients, 7 of whom stapes hypermobility is believed to be a mechanical genesis of their hyperacusis symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, repeated-measure single-arm design was used for this study.

SETTING

All patients were evaluated and treated at a tertiary level otologic referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

21 patients (Cohort A) with severe hyperacusis underwent oval and round window reinforcement. Seven patients (Cohort B) intraoperatively appeared to have subjective hypermobility of the stapes. Additional reinforcement of the stapes superstructure was performed in these patients.

RESULTS

In Cohort A, loudness discomfort level (LDL) values improved on average from 72.7 dB to 81.9 dB. Hyperacusis questionnaire (HQ) scores improved from 30.1 to 14.7. Numeric Rating Scale scores (0-10) decreased from 8.5 to 4.0. In Cohort B, values similarly improved from an average of 72.4 dB to 88.2 dB. HQ scores improved from 35.8 to 18.9. Numeric Rating Scale scores fell from 10.0 to 3.7. Postoperatively there were no complaints of hearing loss. Sixteen out of 21(76%) reported improved quality of life and diminished symptoms of hyperacusis.

CONCLUSION

It is possible that patients suffering from hyperacusis may have a mechanical cause for their symptoms. Further research is necessary to clarify stapes mobility in patients with these symptoms. Excess temporalis tissue reinforcement of the stapes along with round window reinforcement shows promise as a minimally invasive surgical option for patients suffering from hyperacusis.

摘要

目的

听觉过敏是指对日常声音的正常耐受能力下降。尽管已有多篇文献表明,微创手术可能改善患者症状,但听觉过敏的确切病因往往仍不明确。本研究描述了21例患者,其中7例镫骨活动过度被认为是其听觉过敏症状的机械性成因。

研究设计

本研究采用前瞻性、重复测量单臂设计。

研究地点

所有患者均在三级耳科转诊中心接受评估和治疗。

研究对象与方法

21例重度听觉过敏患者(A组)接受了椭圆窗和圆窗加固术。7例患者(B组)术中表现为镫骨主观活动过度。这些患者还接受了镫骨上部结构的额外加固。

结果

A组中,响度不适阈(LDL)值平均从72.7dB提高到81.9dB。听觉过敏问卷(HQ)评分从30.1降至14.7。数字评定量表评分(0-10)从8.5降至4.0。B组中,数值同样从平均72.4dB提高到88.2dB。HQ评分从35.8降至18.9。数字评定量表评分从10.0降至3.7。术后无听力损失主诉。21例患者中有16例(76%)报告生活质量改善,听觉过敏症状减轻。

结论

听觉过敏患者的症状可能存在机械性病因。有必要进一步研究以明确这些症状患者的镫骨活动情况。镫骨颞肌组织过度加固联合圆窗加固,有望成为听觉过敏患者的一种微创手术选择。

相似文献

1
Stapes hypermobility as a possible cause of hyperacusis.镫骨活动度过高作为听觉过敏的一个可能原因。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Hyperacusis.用于治疗听觉过敏的微创手术
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1482-1488. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001214.
3
Round and oval window reinforcement for the treatment of hyperacusis.用于治疗听觉过敏的圆窗和卵圆窗加固术。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of hyperacusis: New technique and long term results.微创治疗听觉过敏:新技术与长期疗效。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;41(1):102319. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102319. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
5
Oval and round window reinforcement surgery leads to improvements in sound tolerance and quality of life for hyperacusis patients.卵圆窗和圆窗加固术可提高听觉过敏患者的听力耐受力和生活质量。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 May-Jun;45(3):104231. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104231. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
6
Round And Oval Window Reinforcement圆窗和卵圆窗加固
7
Occlusion of the round window: a novel way to treat hyperacusis symptoms in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.圆窗封闭:治疗上半规管裂综合征中听觉过敏症状的新方法。
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Jul;127(7):705-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113001096. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.振动成形术中的耦合与定位重要吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Aug;36(7):1223-30. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000790.
9
'Soft reinforcement' of the round window for superior semi-circular canal dehiscence syndrome.针对上半规管裂综合征的圆窗“软性强化”
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Apr;134(4):366-368. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120000353. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.主动式中耳植入物在混合性听力损失中的益处:镫骨与圆窗。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1435-1441. doi: 10.1002/lary.26244. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.