Department of Anatomy, NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA.
Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2018 Dec;125:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Human bipedalism is characterized by mediolateral oscillations of the center of mass (CoM) between the feet. The preferred step widths and CoM oscillations used by humans likely represent a trade-off of several factors (e.g., stance and swing phase costs). However, it is difficult to assess whether human frontal plane control strategies are unique given few detailed data on frontal plane motion during facultative bipedalism in apes. Here, we collected three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data in humans and chimpanzees to investigate the relationship between step width, mediolateral CoM motion, frontal plane trunk kinematics, and CoM power during bipedalism. Chimpanzee bipedalism entails mediolateral CoM oscillations and step widths that are (scaled to lower/hind limb length) three times larger than those of humans. Chimpanzees use a combination of linear and angular motion of the trunk and list the entire trunk, and especially thorax, over the stance side foot, generating large mediolateral shifts in the CoM, whereas humans utilize little angular motion within the trunk. Larger mediolateral CoM motions do not have a significant effect on CoM power. Similarities between bipedal chimpanzees and other bipedal non-human primates (macaques and gibbons) indicate that narrow CoM motions are unique to humans and are likely due to our adducted hips and valgus knees. Valgus knees appear early in the human fossil record (∼3.6 Ma), contemporaneous with the Laetoli footprints. However, fossils attributed to Ardipithecus ramidus (∼4.4 Ma) suggest that the earliest hominins may have lacked a hominin-like degree of knee valgus. If correct, this suggests that this species may have used wide steps, larger mediolateral CoM motions, and perhaps larger trunk motions during bipedal walking. Finally, we present a novel means to estimate mediolateral CoM motion from trackway step width, and estimate that the Laetoli G track maker used CoM motions within the human range.
人类的两足行走特征是双脚之间的质心(CoM)在横向和纵向的摆动。人类首选的步幅和 CoM 摆动可能是权衡了几个因素的结果(例如,站立和摆动阶段的成本)。然而,由于关于猿类在选择性双足行走时的额状面运动的详细数据很少,因此很难评估人类的额状面控制策略是否具有独特性。在这里,我们收集了人类和黑猩猩的三维运动学和动力学数据,以研究双足行走时的步幅、横向 CoM 运动、额状面躯干运动学和 CoM 功率之间的关系。黑猩猩的两足行走涉及到 CoM 的横向摆动和步幅,这些步幅(按下肢长度缩小)是人类的三倍大。黑猩猩采用躯干的线性和角运动的组合,并将整个躯干,特别是胸部,摆到支撑侧的脚上,使 CoM 产生很大的横向移动,而人类在躯干内很少使用角运动。更大的 CoM 横向运动对 CoM 功率没有显著影响。与其他两足非人类灵长类动物(猕猴和长臂猿)相比,两足的黑猩猩表明,狭窄的 CoM 运动是人类独有的,这可能是由于我们的髋关节内收和膝关节外翻。膝关节外翻在人类化石记录中出现得很早(约 360 万年前),与拉多里脚印同时代。然而,被归为 Ardipithecus ramidus(约 440 万年前)的化石表明,最早的原始人可能缺乏人类那样的膝关节外翻程度。如果这是正确的,这表明该物种在双足行走时可能使用了较宽的步幅、更大的 CoM 横向运动,以及可能更大的躯干运动。最后,我们提出了一种从足迹步幅估计 CoM 横向运动的新方法,并估计拉多里 G 足迹制造者使用了 CoM 运动在人类范围内。