Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.
Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2022 Jul;168:103195. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103195. Epub 2022 May 18.
Humans are unique among apes and other primates in the musculoskeletal design of their lower back, pelvis, and lower limbs. Here, we describe the three-dimensional ground reaction forces and lower/hindlimb joint mechanics of human and bipedal chimpanzees walking over a full stride and test whether: 1) the estimated limb joint work and power during the stance phase, especially the single-support period, is lower in humans than bipedal chimpanzees, 2) the limb joint work and power required for limb swing is lower in humans than in bipedal chimpanzees, and 3) the estimated total mechanical power during walking, accounting for the storage of passive elastic strain energy in humans, is lower in humans than in bipedal chimpanzees. Humans and bipedal chimpanzees were compared at matched dimensionless and dimensional velocities. Our results indicate that humans walk with significantly less work and power output in the first double-support period and the single-support period of stance, but markedly exceed chimpanzees in the second double-support period (i.e., push-off). Humans generate less work and power in limb swing, although the species difference in limb swing power was not statistically significant. We estimated that total mechanical positive 'muscle fiber' work and power were 46.9% and 35.8% lower, respectively, in humans than in bipedal chimpanzees at matched dimensionless speeds. This is due in part to mechanisms for the storage and release of elastic energy at the ankle and hip in humans. Furthermore, these results indicate distinct 'heel strike' and 'lateral balance' mechanics in humans and bipedal chimpanzees and suggest a greater dissipation of mechanical energy through soft tissue deformations in humans. Together, our results document important differences between human and bipedal chimpanzee walking mechanics over a full stride, permitting a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanics and energetics of chimpanzee bipedalism and the evolution of hominin walking.
人类在其腰背、骨盆和下肢的骨骼肌肉设计上与猿类和其他灵长类动物有明显的区别。在这里,我们描述了人类和两足黑猩猩在整个步行周期中的三维地面反作用力和下肢/后肢关节力学,并检验了以下假设:1)人类在站立阶段(特别是单足支撑阶段)的肢体关节功和功率估计值是否低于两足黑猩猩,2)人类在摆动阶段所需的肢体关节功和功率是否低于两足黑猩猩,以及 3)考虑到人类被动弹性应变能的储存,行走过程中的总机械功率是否低于两足黑猩猩。我们在匹配的无量纲和维度速度下比较了人类和两足黑猩猩。结果表明,人类在第一双足支撑期和支撑期的单足支撑期的行走中具有明显较低的功和功率输出,但在第二双足支撑期(即蹬离)显著超过黑猩猩。人类在肢体摆动中产生的功和功率较小,尽管物种间在肢体摆动功率上的差异没有统计学意义。我们估计,在匹配的无量纲速度下,人类的总机械正“肌纤维”功和功率分别比两足黑猩猩低 46.9%和 35.8%。这部分是由于人类踝关节和髋关节的弹性储能和释放机制。此外,这些结果表明人类和两足黑猩猩在“脚跟触地”和“横向平衡”力学方面存在明显差异,并表明人类通过软组织变形更有效地耗散机械能。总之,我们的研究结果记录了人类和两足黑猩猩在完整步幅行走中的力学差异,从而更全面地了解了黑猩猩两足行走的力学和能量学以及人类行走的演化。