MacLean R Ross, Pincus Aaron L, Smyth Joshua M, Geier Charles F, Wilson Stephen J
Department of Psychiatry, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave. 116B, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2018 Mar;40(1):107-116. doi: 10.1007/s10862-017-9628-4. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) is a behavioral measure that is commonly used to assess risk taking propensity. The primary goal of the present study was to introduce a mobile version of the BART (mBART) that can be included within ambulatory assessment protocols to assess risk taking in daily life. Study 1 compared common BART indices (i.e., total money earned, adjusted average pumps, balloon explosions, and coefficient of variability [CV]) on a single administration of the laboratory BART on a computer and the mBART on a smartphone ( = 78). Results revealed generally consistent relationships between indices of risk taking propensity in both the laboratory BART and mBART. Study 2 administered the mBART as part of a 7-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol in a population of nondaily smokers ( = 51). Using multi-level models, results suggest that males have greater adjusted average pumps ( = .03), and that a participant's average CV is negatively related to trait sensation seeking ( = .03) and positively associated with trait positive urgency ( = .04). There were within-person effects of study day ( = .05) and environment ( = .02) with respect to adjusted average pumps such that individuals took greater risks as the study progressed and were riskier when alone compared to with others. Inclusion of the mBART in EMA did not appear to significantly increase participant burden and demonstrated acceptable levels of compliance. These results offer initial evidence supporting the feasibility and utility of the mBART for ambulatory research designs.
气球模拟风险任务(BART)是一种常用于评估冒险倾向的行为测量方法。本研究的主要目标是引入BART的移动版本(mBART),它可纳入动态评估方案中,以评估日常生活中的冒险行为。研究1比较了在计算机上单次进行的实验室BART和在智能手机上进行的mBART(n = 78)的常见BART指标(即总盈利、调整后的平均打气次数、气球爆炸次数和变异系数[CV])。结果显示,实验室BART和mBART中冒险倾向指标之间的关系总体上是一致的。研究2在非每日吸烟者群体(n = 51)中,将mBART作为为期7天的生态瞬时评估(EMA)方案的一部分进行施测。使用多层次模型,结果表明男性的调整后平均打气次数更多(p = .03),并且参与者的平均CV与特质感觉寻求呈负相关(p = .03),与特质积极紧迫性呈正相关(p = .04)。在调整后的平均打气次数方面,存在研究日(p = .05)和环境(p = .02)的个体内效应,即随着研究的进行,个体承担的风险更大,并且与他人在一起时相比,独自时更具冒险性。将mBART纳入EMA似乎并未显著增加参与者的负担,并且显示出可接受的依从水平。这些结果提供了初步证据,支持mBART在动态研究设计中的可行性和实用性。