Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, 492 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506-5302, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3433-3445. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01966-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
In this study, we examined the effects of pairing sounds with positive and negative outcomes in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). A number of published studies using the BART incorporate sounds into the task, where a slot machine or cash register sound is produced when rewards are collected and a popping sound is produced when balloons pop. However, some studies do not use sound, and other studies do not specify whether sound was used. Given that sensory information contributes to the intensity of experiences, it is possible that outcome-related sounds in the BART influence risk-taking behaviors, and inconsistent use of sounds across the many BART variations may affect how results are interpreted. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of sounds paired with outcomes in the BART, and whether the presence or valence of a sound would systematically alter participants' risk-taking. Across two experiments using Bayesian censored regressions, we show that sounds, regardless of the outcomes they were paired with or their valence, did not affect risk-taking in an adult, non-clinical sample. We consider the implications of these results within methodological and theoretical contexts and encourage researchers to continue dissociating the role of auditory stimuli in feedback processing and subsequent responding.
在这项研究中,我们考察了在气球模拟风险任务(BART)中,将声音与正、负结果进行配对的效果。一些发表的使用 BART 的研究将声音纳入任务中,当奖励被收集时会发出老虎机或收银机的声音,当气球爆裂时会发出爆裂声。然而,有些研究没有使用声音,而其他研究则没有说明是否使用了声音。鉴于感官信息会影响体验的强度,BART 中与结果相关的声音可能会影响冒险行为,并且在许多 BART 变体中不一致地使用声音可能会影响对结果的解释。因此,本研究的目的是调查 BART 中与结果配对的声音的影响,以及声音的存在或效价是否会系统地改变参与者的冒险行为。通过两个使用贝叶斯截尾回归的实验,我们表明,声音,无论与它们配对的结果或它们的效价如何,都不会影响成年非临床样本的冒险行为。我们在方法学和理论背景下考虑了这些结果的含义,并鼓励研究人员继续分离听觉刺激在反馈处理和随后的反应中的作用。