• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的术前风险模型

Pre-procedural risk models for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

作者信息

Martin Glen P, Sperrin Matthew, Mamas Mamas A

机构信息

Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 30):S3560-S3567. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.67.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2018.05.67
PMID:30505535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6242921/
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the standard treatment option for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered intermediate to high surgical risk. Nonetheless, optimal clinical outcomes following the procedure require careful consideration of procedural risk by the Heart Team. While this decision-making could be supported through the development of TAVI-specific clinical prediction models (CPMs), current models remain suboptimal. In this review paper, we aimed to outline the performance of several recently derived TAVI CPMs that predict mortality and present some future research directions. We discuss how the existing risk models have achieved only moderate discrimination but highlight that some of the models are well calibrated across multiple populations, indicating the feasibility of using them to aid benchmarking analyses. Moreover, we suggest that future work should focus on the development of CPMs in cohorts of patients with aortic stenosis that include multiple treatment modalities. Supported by appropriate modelling of 'what if' scenarios, this would allow the Heart Teams to predict and compare outcomes across surgical aortic valve replacement, medical management and TAVI, thereby allowing one to personalise treatment decisions to the individual patient. Such a goal could be facilitated by considering novel risk factors, shifting the focus to endpoints other than mortality, and through collaborative efforts to combine the evidence base and existing models across wider populations.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄且被认为手术风险为中到高的患者的标准治疗选择。尽管如此,该手术后的最佳临床结果需要心脏团队仔细考虑手术风险。虽然通过开发TAVI特异性临床预测模型(CPM)可以支持这一决策过程,但目前的模型仍不尽人意。在这篇综述论文中,我们旨在概述几种最近得出的预测死亡率的TAVI CPM的性能,并提出一些未来的研究方向。我们讨论了现有的风险模型如何仅实现了中等程度的辨别力,但强调其中一些模型在多个人群中校准良好,表明使用它们来辅助基准分析的可行性。此外,我们建议未来的工作应专注于在包括多种治疗方式的主动脉瓣狭窄患者队列中开发CPM。在对“如果……会怎样”情景进行适当建模的支持下,这将使心脏团队能够预测和比较外科主动脉瓣置换术、药物治疗和TAVI之间跨治疗方式的结果,从而能够根据个体患者的情况个性化治疗决策。通过考虑新的风险因素、将重点转移到死亡率以外的终点,并通过合作努力在更广泛的人群中整合证据基础和现有模型,可以促进实现这一目标。

相似文献

1
Pre-procedural risk models for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的术前风险模型
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 30):S3560-S3567. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.67.
2
Inadequacy of existing clinical prediction models for predicting mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.现有临床预测模型在预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率方面存在不足。
Am Heart J. 2017 Feb;184:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 研究中危倾向人群的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 May 26.
5
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
7
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危外科手术风险人群的成本效益比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;294:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis: complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany.2013 年德国接受治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归:完整数据集。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):553-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-0962-4. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
9
Clinical outcomes of heart-team-guided treatment decisions in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis in a health-economic context with limited resources for transcatheter valve therapies.在经导管瓣膜治疗资源有限的卫生经济背景下,心脏团队指导高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗决策的临床结果。
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Dec;74(6):489-498. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1522461. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4556.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Wait-Time Management: Derivation and Validation of the Canadian TAVI Triage Tool (CAN3T).经导管主动脉瓣植入术等待时间管理:加拿大 TAVI 分诊工具(CAN3T)的推导和验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):e033768. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033768. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Update and, internal and temporal-validation of the FRANCE-2 and ACC-TAVI early-mortality prediction models for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using data from the Netherlands heart registration (NHR).利用荷兰心脏注册(NHR)的数据,对用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的FRANCE - 2和ACC - TAVI早期死亡率预测模型进行更新、内部及时间验证。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jan 23;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Which preoperative screening tool should be applied to older patients undergoing elective surgery to predict short-term postoperative outcomes? Lessons from systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines: heart and non-cardiac surgery need a different approach?对于接受择期手术的老年患者,应采用哪种术前筛查工具来预测术后短期结局?来自系统评价、荟萃分析和指南的经验教训:心脏手术和非心脏手术需要不同的方法吗?
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;16(1):15-17. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02497-8. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
Risk modeling in transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains unsolved: an external validation study in 2946 German patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的风险建模仍未解决:2946 例德国患者的外部验证研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar;110(3):368-376. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01731-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvement of Risk Prediction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement by Combining Frailty With Conventional Risk Scores.经衰弱指数与常规风险评分联合应用以改善经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的风险预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 26;11(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.012.
2
Clinical Frailty as an Outcome Predictor After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后临床衰弱作为结局预测指标
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;121(7):850-855. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.035. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
A multiple-model generalisation of updating clinical prediction models.一种更新临床预测模型的多模型推广方法。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1343-1358. doi: 10.1002/sim.7586. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
4
Novel United Kingdom prognostic model for 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后 30 天死亡率的新型英国预后模型。
Heart. 2018 Jul;104(13):1109-1116. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312489. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Predicting Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: External Validation of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry Model.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率预测:经导管瓣膜治疗登记模型的外部验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005481.
6
Relative Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How Do Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Fare Relative to the General Population?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的相对生存率:行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者与普通人群相比预后如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007229. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007229.
7
TAVI risk scoring using established versus new scoring systems: role of the new STS/ACC model.采用现有评分系统与新型评分系统对 TAVI 风险进行评分:新型 STS/ACC 模型的作用。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1520-1526. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00421.
8
Importance of the valve durability-life expectancy ratio in selection of a prosthetic aortic valve.瓣膜耐用性与预期寿命之比在人工主动脉瓣选择中的重要性。
Heart. 2017 Nov;103(22):1756-1759. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312348. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.老年主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱:FRAILTY-AVR 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
The Proliferation of Scoring Systems: Trying to Keep Our Heads Out of The Clouds.评分系统的泛滥:努力保持清醒头脑
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 28;69(12):1640-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.017.