Martin Glen P, Sperrin Matthew, Mamas Mamas A
Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 30):S3560-S3567. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.67.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the standard treatment option for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered intermediate to high surgical risk. Nonetheless, optimal clinical outcomes following the procedure require careful consideration of procedural risk by the Heart Team. While this decision-making could be supported through the development of TAVI-specific clinical prediction models (CPMs), current models remain suboptimal. In this review paper, we aimed to outline the performance of several recently derived TAVI CPMs that predict mortality and present some future research directions. We discuss how the existing risk models have achieved only moderate discrimination but highlight that some of the models are well calibrated across multiple populations, indicating the feasibility of using them to aid benchmarking analyses. Moreover, we suggest that future work should focus on the development of CPMs in cohorts of patients with aortic stenosis that include multiple treatment modalities. Supported by appropriate modelling of 'what if' scenarios, this would allow the Heart Teams to predict and compare outcomes across surgical aortic valve replacement, medical management and TAVI, thereby allowing one to personalise treatment decisions to the individual patient. Such a goal could be facilitated by considering novel risk factors, shifting the focus to endpoints other than mortality, and through collaborative efforts to combine the evidence base and existing models across wider populations.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄且被认为手术风险为中到高的患者的标准治疗选择。尽管如此,该手术后的最佳临床结果需要心脏团队仔细考虑手术风险。虽然通过开发TAVI特异性临床预测模型(CPM)可以支持这一决策过程,但目前的模型仍不尽人意。在这篇综述论文中,我们旨在概述几种最近得出的预测死亡率的TAVI CPM的性能,并提出一些未来的研究方向。我们讨论了现有的风险模型如何仅实现了中等程度的辨别力,但强调其中一些模型在多个人群中校准良好,表明使用它们来辅助基准分析的可行性。此外,我们建议未来的工作应专注于在包括多种治疗方式的主动脉瓣狭窄患者队列中开发CPM。在对“如果……会怎样”情景进行适当建模的支持下,这将使心脏团队能够预测和比较外科主动脉瓣置换术、药物治疗和TAVI之间跨治疗方式的结果,从而能够根据个体患者的情况个性化治疗决策。通过考虑新的风险因素、将重点转移到死亡率以外的终点,并通过合作努力在更广泛的人群中整合证据基础和现有模型,可以促进实现这一目标。