• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用现有评分系统与新型评分系统对 TAVI 风险进行评分:新型 STS/ACC 模型的作用。

TAVI risk scoring using established versus new scoring systems: role of the new STS/ACC model.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1520-1526. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00421.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00421
PMID:28994653
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to validate the recently developed STS/ACC TAVR in-hospital mortality risk score for predicting in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aotic valve implantation (TAVI) and to compare its ability to predict 30-day mortality with that of four other established risk models (EuroSCORE I, EuroSCORE II, STS-PROM, and German AV Score).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study cohort included 946 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2015. Each of the five scores was fitted as a continuous linear variable into a logistic regression model estimating 30-day mortality. The STS/ACC TAVR score was additionally analysed for in-hospital mortality. C-statistics and likelihood ratio (LR) test p-values were estimated for each model to describe the model fit. The ability of the STS/ACC score to predict in-hospital mortality was similar to the reported STS/ACC TVT registry data (this study's C-statistic 0.65 vs. STS/ACC TVT registry 0.66). The STS-PROM score (C-statistic=0.68; LR p<0.0001) and the new STS/ACC TAVR score (C-statistic=0.68; LR p<0.0001) were superior to the other scores (EuroSCORE I [C-statistic=0.55; LR p=0.02], EuroSCORE II [C-statistic=0.58; LR p=0.02], German AV Score [C-statistic=0.62; LR p<0.01]) for prediction of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show the superiority of the STS-PROM and STS/ACC TAVR scores compared with other existing risk calculation models in predicting 30-day mortality after TAVI in a German all-comers population. The STS/ACC TAVR score, however, is easier to calculate (12 vs. 28 variables), and may thus gain wider acceptance and be accompanied by improved inter-observer reliability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证最近开发的 STS/ACC TAVR 院内死亡率风险评分,以预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后的院内死亡率,并比较其预测 30 天死亡率的能力与其他四个已建立的风险模型(EuroSCORE I、EuroSCORE II、STS-PROM 和德国 AV 评分)。

方法和结果

本研究队列纳入了 2013 年至 2015 年间接受 TAVI 的 946 例连续患者。将五个评分中的每一个都拟合为一个连续线性变量,纳入一个逻辑回归模型,以估计 30 天死亡率。还对 STS/ACC TAVR 评分进行了院内死亡率分析。为每个模型估计了 C 统计量和似然比(LR)检验 p 值,以描述模型拟合度。STS/ACC 评分预测院内死亡率的能力与报告的 STS/ACC TVT 登记数据相似(本研究的 C 统计量为 0.65,STS/ACC TVT 登记为 0.66)。STS-PROM 评分(C 统计量=0.68;LR p<0.0001)和新的 STS/ACC TAVR 评分(C 统计量=0.68;LR p<0.0001)优于其他评分(EuroSCORE I [C 统计量=0.55;LR p=0.02]、EuroSCORE II [C 统计量=0.58;LR p=0.02]、德国 AV 评分 [C 统计量=0.62;LR p<0.01]),可更好地预测 TAVI 后 30 天死亡率。

结论

这些数据表明,在德国所有患者人群中,STS-PROM 和 STS/ACC TAVR 评分在预测 TAVI 后 30 天死亡率方面优于其他现有风险计算模型。然而,STS/ACC TAVR 评分计算更简单(12 个变量与 28 个变量),因此可能会得到更广泛的认可,并提高观察者间的可靠性。

相似文献

1
TAVI risk scoring using established versus new scoring systems: role of the new STS/ACC model.采用现有评分系统与新型评分系统对 TAVI 风险进行评分:新型 STS/ACC 模型的作用。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1520-1526. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00421.
2
Improvement of Risk Prediction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement by Combining Frailty With Conventional Risk Scores.经衰弱指数与常规风险评分联合应用以改善经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的风险预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 26;11(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.012.
3
Current Society of Thoracic Surgeons Model Reclassifies Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.现行胸外科医师学会模型重新分类经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006664.
4
Validation of STS/ACC TVT-TAVR Score in Veterans Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术退伍军人中STS/ACC TVT-TAVR评分的验证
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):447-451. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
5
Mortality risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: analysis of the predictive accuracy of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry risk assessment model.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的死亡率风险:经导管瓣膜治疗注册风险评估模型的预测准确性分析。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jul 20;14(4):e405-e412. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00032.
6
Outcomes for the Commercial Use of Self-Expanding Prostheses in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中自膨式假体的商业应用结局:来自 STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2090-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.027.
7
Predicting Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: External Validation of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry Model.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率预测:经导管瓣膜治疗登记模型的外部验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005481.
8
Prediction of 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison of logistic EuroSCORE, STS score, and EuroSCORE II.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后30天死亡率的预测:逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统、胸外科医师协会评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II的比较
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Sep;23(5):567-74.
9
EuroSCORE II and the STS score are more accurate in transapical than in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分在经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术中比在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中更准确。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):413-419. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx343.
10
Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在美国大型数据库中的表现:对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;46(3):400-8; discussion 408. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes and calcific aortic valve disease: controversy of clinical outcomes in diabetes after aortic valve replacement.糖尿病与钙化性主动脉瓣疾病:主动脉瓣置换术后糖尿病患者临床结局的争议
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 30;16:1577762. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1577762. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient risk evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (PRE-TAVR) - identification of real-time predictors of short- and long-term mortality.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者风险评估(PRE-TAVR)——短期和长期死亡率实时预测指标的识别
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02704-6.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Indications and Patient Selection.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术的适应症及患者选择
Interv Cardiol. 2025 Jun 10;20:e19. doi: 10.15420/icr.2024.44. eCollection 2025.
4
The Staging of Cardiac Damage for Aortic Stenosis: A Review.主动脉瓣狭窄心脏损害的分期:综述
Struct Heart. 2024 Oct 24;9(3):100370. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100370. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Extracellular Matrix Proteins Improve Risk Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.细胞外基质蛋白可改善经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的风险预测。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037296. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037296. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
Prognostic utility of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin and growth differentiation factor 15 in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.中段肾上腺髓质素和生长分化因子15在经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术患者中的预后效用
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct 25. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02560-w.
7
Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Pooled Patient-Level Study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的脑血管事件:一项汇总患者水平的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e032901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032901. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
8
Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中TVT和STS风险评分表现的评估
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Apr 21;2(3):100600. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100600. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
9
A Risk Model for 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the J-TVT Registry.基于J-TVT注册研究的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年死亡率风险模型
JACC Asia. 2022 Oct 4;2(5):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.06.002. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Similar clinical outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局相似。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;9:947197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.947197. eCollection 2022.