Sallam Ahmed B, Kirkland Kyle A, Barry Richard, Soliman Mohamed Kamel, Ali Tayyeba K, Lightman Sue
Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2018 Winter;7(4):140-155.
Treatment of infectious posterior uveitis represents a therapeutic challenge for ophthalmologists. The eye is a privileged site, maintained by blood ocular barriers, which limits penetration of systemic antimicrobials into the posterior segment. In addition, topical and subconjunctival therapies are incapable of producing sufficient drug concentrations, intraocularly. Posterior infectious uveitis can be caused by bacteria, virus, fungi, or protozoa. Mode of treatment varies greatly based on the infectious etiology. Certain drugs have advantages over others in the treatment of infectious uveitis. Topical and systemic therapies are often employed in the treatment of ocular infection, yet the route of treatment can have limitations based on penetration, concentration, and duration. The introduction of intravitreal antimicrobial therapy has advanced the management of intraocular infections. Being able to bypass blood-ocular barriers allows high drug concentrations to be delivered directly to the posterior segment with minimal systemic absorption. However, because the difference between the therapeutic and the toxic doses of some antimicrobial drugs falls within a narrow concentration range, intravitreal therapy could be associated with ocular toxicity risks. In many cases of infectious uveitis, combination of intravitreal and systemic therapies are necessary. In this comprehensive review, the authors aimed at reviewing clinically relevant data regarding intraocular and systemic antimicrobial therapy for posterior segment infectious uveitis. The review also discussed the evolving trends in intraocular treatment, and elaborated on antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and adverse effects.
感染性后葡萄膜炎的治疗对眼科医生而言是一项治疗挑战。眼睛是一个特殊部位,由血眼屏障维持其生理状态,这限制了全身抗菌药物进入眼后段。此外,局部和结膜下治疗无法在眼内产生足够的药物浓度。后部感染性葡萄膜炎可由细菌、病毒、真菌或原生动物引起。治疗方式因感染病因的不同而有很大差异。某些药物在治疗感染性葡萄膜炎方面比其他药物更具优势。局部和全身治疗常用于眼部感染的治疗,但治疗途径可能因药物渗透、浓度和持续时间而存在局限性。玻璃体内抗菌治疗的引入推动了眼内感染的管理。能够绕过血眼屏障可使高浓度药物直接输送至眼后段,同时全身吸收最少。然而,由于某些抗菌药物的治疗剂量和毒性剂量之间的差异处于较窄的浓度范围内,玻璃体内治疗可能存在眼毒性风险。在许多感染性葡萄膜炎病例中,玻璃体内治疗和全身治疗相结合是必要的。在这篇综述中,作者旨在回顾关于眼内和全身抗菌治疗后段感染性葡萄膜炎的临床相关数据。该综述还讨论了眼内治疗的发展趋势,并阐述了抗生素的药代动力学和药效学、疗效及不良反应。