Suppr超能文献

常规检查时无意导致气管插管套囊放气:一项模拟研究。

Unintentional endotracheal tube cuff deflation during routine checks: a simulation study.

机构信息

University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.

The Critical Care Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Mar;24(2):83-88. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12397. Epub 2018 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal tube cuff pressures should be maintained between 20 and 30 cm H O to prevent the aspiration of subglottic secretions past the cuff. Guidance recommends regular monitoring of the cuff pressure, performed using a handheld manometer/inflator. Poor technique can lead to transient deflation of the cuff, leading to the bolus aspiration of upper respiratory tract secretions, tracheal colonization and, ultimately, ventilator-associated pneumonia.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To determine whether intensive care staff transiently deflate the endotracheal tube cuff to below 20 cm H O during routine cuff pressure checks when using a handheld manometer/inflator device.

DESIGN

This was an exploratory simulation study.

METHODS

A sample of medical (n = 10) and nursing staff (n = 10), capable of caring for a tracheally intubated patient, participated in the study on a single day. A mannequin was intubated with a standard oral endotracheal tube with the cuff pressure set at 50 cm H O. Participants were required to check and correct the cuff pressure to the appropriate level with a manometer. The lowest attained and the final target pressures were recorded.

RESULTS

Three doctors were unfamiliar with the manometer and did not attempt measurement. During cuff pressure readjustment, 59% (10/17) of participants transiently deflated the cuff below 20 cm H O and then re-inflated to attain the final pressure. Of these participants, four deflated the cuff pressure to 0 cm H O before re-adjusting it back into range. Most participants, 88% (15/17), corrected the final cuff pressure to between 20 and 30 cm H O.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor technique when using the manometer led to unintentional cuff deflation during routine checks. In clinical practice, this could increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Further research into alternatives for handheld manometers, such as automated continuous cuff pressure monitors, is warranted.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Cuff deflations can easily occur during routine cuff pressure checks. Staff should be aware of the implications of cuff deflations and seek to improve training with manometers.

摘要

背景

为了防止气囊上方的声门下分泌物被吸入,气管内导管的气囊压力应维持在 20 至 30 厘米水柱之间。指南建议定期使用手动测压表/充气装置监测气囊压力。技术不佳可能会导致气囊短暂放气,导致上呼吸道分泌物被吸入气囊,气管定植,最终导致呼吸机相关性肺炎。

目的和目标

确定在使用手动测压表/充气装置进行常规气囊压力检查时,重症监护病房的工作人员是否会在检查过程中使气管内导管的气囊压力短暂降至 20 厘米水柱以下。

设计

这是一项探索性模拟研究。

方法

在一天内,我们招募了 10 名医务人员和 10 名护理人员,他们能够对气管插管的患者进行护理,参与了这项研究。使用标准的口腔气管内导管对模拟人进行插管,气囊压力设置为 50 厘米水柱。要求参与者使用测压表检查并将气囊压力调整至适当水平。记录最低到达的和最终目标压力。

结果

有 3 名医生不熟悉测压表,未尝试进行测量。在调整气囊压力期间,有 59%(10/17)的参与者会使气囊压力短暂降至 20 厘米水柱以下,然后重新充气至最终压力。在这些参与者中,有 4 人将气囊压力降至 0 厘米水柱,然后再将其重新调整至正常范围内。大多数参与者(15/17)将最终的气囊压力校正至 20 至 30 厘米水柱之间。

结论

使用测压表时技术不佳会导致在常规检查中无意地使气囊放气。在临床实践中,这可能会增加肺吸入和呼吸机相关性肺炎的风险。有必要进一步研究手动测压表的替代方法,如自动连续气囊压力监测器。

临床意义

在常规气囊压力检查过程中,气囊放气很容易发生。工作人员应意识到气囊放气的影响,并寻求改进测压表使用方面的培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验