CT, MRI, and PET imaging features in cervical cancer staging and lymph node metastasis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) fusion imaging technique features in cervical cancer staging and lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

A total of 196 cervical cancer patients undergoing CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI preoperatively were enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy and detection rates for paracervical invasion were evaluated on the basis of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification for cervical cancer. The diagnostic efficacy of each examination modality for determining lymph node metastasis was evaluated using surgical pathology as a reference. The CT and MRI imaging features of lymph node metastasis were compared.

RESULTS

PET/MRI had a higher diagnostic accuracy for cervical cancer (94.90%) than PET/CT, MRI, and CT (83.67%, 75.51%, and 69.39%) ( < 0.05). PET/MRI showed a higher detection rate of vaginal invasion, uterine invasion, bladder invasion, and cervical invasion than PET/CT, MRI, and CT ( < 0.05). The metastasis group showed higher maximum long and short axis diameters and axial ratios than the non-metastasis group ( < 0.05). The metastasis group had higher wash-in rates (WIR), maximum relative enhancements (MRE), wash-out ratios (WOR), and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC), and lower times to peak (TTP) than the non-metastasis group ( < 0.05). The sensitivity (94.74%), specificity (93.33%), and accuracy (93.88%) of PET/MRI in the diagnosis of cervical cancer lymph node metastasis were higher than the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT, MRI and CT ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CT, MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI can be used effectively in the diagnosis of cervical cancer staging and lymph node metastasis, among which PET/MRI has a higher diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is helpful in clinical diagnosis and treatment.