Vural Meltem, Yalcinkaya Ebru Yilmaz, Celik Evrim Coskun, Gunduz Berrin, Bozan Ahmet, Erhan Belgin
University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):193-200. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1543093. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
To assess the impact of spasticity severity as well as socio-demographic and clinical factors on quality of life (QOL) and to identify factors predicting poor QOL among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) Descriptive cross-sectional study. Tertiary care clinic in Istanbul, Turkey. A total of 110 patients with SCI (mean (SD) age: 43.8 (14.7) years, 58.2% were males) were enrolled. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Turkish version of the World Health Organization Quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) were utilized to determine the SCI category, severity of spasticity and QOL scores, respectively. The WHOQOL-BREF scores were evaluated with respect to the severity of spasticity, aetiology and duration of SCI, AIS category and method of bladder management. The mean (SD) physical health (41.9 (15.3) vs. 46.5 (10.9), P = 0.029), social relationships (45.6 (20.2) vs. 53.8 (17.3), P = 0.025) and total WHOQOL-BREF scores were significantly lower in patients with more severe spasticity. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that severity of spasticity was a significant predictor of decreased WHOQOL-BREF total scores, physical domain scores and social relations domain scores by 11.381 (P = 0.007), 11.518 (P = 0.005) and 17. 965 (P = 0.004), respectively. In conclusion, addressing QOL in relation to severity of spasticity for the first time among Turkish SCI patients, our findings revealed a negative impact of the spasticity severity on the WHOQOL-BREF scores, particularly for physical health and social relationship domains.
评估痉挛严重程度以及社会人口学和临床因素对生活质量(QOL)的影响,并确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中预测生活质量差的因素。描述性横断面研究。土耳其伊斯坦布尔的三级护理诊所。共纳入110例SCI患者(平均(标准差)年龄:43.8(14.7)岁,58.2%为男性)。分别使用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表(AIS)、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和土耳其语版世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)来确定SCI类别、痉挛严重程度和生活质量得分。根据痉挛严重程度、SCI的病因和持续时间、AIS类别以及膀胱管理方法对WHOQOL-BREF得分进行评估。痉挛更严重的患者的平均(标准差)身体健康得分(41.9(15.3)对46.5(10.9),P = 0.029)、社会关系得分(45.6(20.2)对53.8(17.3),P = 0.025)和WHOQOL-BREF总得分显著更低。多变量线性回归分析显示,痉挛严重程度是WHOQOL-BREF总得分、身体领域得分和社会关系领域得分降低的显著预测因素,分别降低11.381(P = 0.007)、11.518(P = 0.005)和17.965(P = 0.004)。总之,在土耳其SCI患者中首次针对痉挛严重程度探讨生活质量,我们的研究结果显示痉挛严重程度对WHOQOL-BREF得分有负面影响,尤其是对身体健康和社会关系领域。