Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者生活质量与痉挛严重程度及社会人口学和临床因素的相关性评估。

Assessment of quality of life in relation to spasticity severity and socio-demographic and clinical factors among patients with spinal cord injury.

作者信息

Vural Meltem, Yalcinkaya Ebru Yilmaz, Celik Evrim Coskun, Gunduz Berrin, Bozan Ahmet, Erhan Belgin

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):193-200. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1543093. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Abstract

To assess the impact of spasticity severity as well as socio-demographic and clinical factors on quality of life (QOL) and to identify factors predicting poor QOL among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) Descriptive cross-sectional study. Tertiary care clinic in Istanbul, Turkey. A total of 110 patients with SCI (mean (SD) age: 43.8 (14.7) years, 58.2% were males) were enrolled. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Turkish version of the World Health Organization Quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) were utilized to determine the SCI category, severity of spasticity and QOL scores, respectively. The WHOQOL-BREF scores were evaluated with respect to the severity of spasticity, aetiology and duration of SCI, AIS category and method of bladder management. The mean (SD) physical health (41.9 (15.3) vs. 46.5 (10.9), P = 0.029), social relationships (45.6 (20.2) vs. 53.8 (17.3), P = 0.025) and total WHOQOL-BREF scores were significantly lower in patients with more severe spasticity. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that severity of spasticity was a significant predictor of decreased WHOQOL-BREF total scores, physical domain scores and social relations domain scores by 11.381 (P = 0.007), 11.518 (P = 0.005) and 17. 965 (P = 0.004), respectively. In conclusion, addressing QOL in relation to severity of spasticity for the first time among Turkish SCI patients, our findings revealed a negative impact of the spasticity severity on the WHOQOL-BREF scores, particularly for physical health and social relationship domains.

摘要

评估痉挛严重程度以及社会人口学和临床因素对生活质量(QOL)的影响,并确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中预测生活质量差的因素。描述性横断面研究。土耳其伊斯坦布尔的三级护理诊所。共纳入110例SCI患者(平均(标准差)年龄:43.8(14.7)岁,58.2%为男性)。分别使用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表(AIS)、改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和土耳其语版世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)来确定SCI类别、痉挛严重程度和生活质量得分。根据痉挛严重程度、SCI的病因和持续时间、AIS类别以及膀胱管理方法对WHOQOL-BREF得分进行评估。痉挛更严重的患者的平均(标准差)身体健康得分(41.9(15.3)对46.5(10.9),P = 0.029)、社会关系得分(45.6(20.2)对53.8(17.3),P = 0.025)和WHOQOL-BREF总得分显著更低。多变量线性回归分析显示,痉挛严重程度是WHOQOL-BREF总得分、身体领域得分和社会关系领域得分降低的显著预测因素,分别降低11.381(P = 0.007)、11.518(P = 0.005)和17.965(P = 0.004)。总之,在土耳其SCI患者中首次针对痉挛严重程度探讨生活质量,我们的研究结果显示痉挛严重程度对WHOQOL-BREF得分有负面影响,尤其是对身体健康和社会关系领域。

相似文献

2
Quality of life after traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury: a North Indian perspective.
Spinal Cord. 2023 Jul;61(7):374-382. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00900-7. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Assessment of the unmediated relationship between neurological impairment and health-related quality of life following spinal cord injury.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Mar;45(2):293-300. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1788884. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1890-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.032.
7
Examining the Effects of a Powered Exoskeleton on Quality of Life and Secondary Impairments in People Living With Spinal Cord Injury.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Fall;24(4):336-342. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00055. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Relationship between self- and clinically rated spasticity in spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.312.

引用本文的文献

4
Predictive factors and quality of life assessment among patients with spinal cord injury in the Middle East: a systematic review.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2081-2094. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03650-y. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Risk Factors for Suicidality in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Focus on Physical and Functional Characteristics.
Ann Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct;47(5):377-384. doi: 10.5535/arm.23110. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Potential benefits of spinal cord stimulation treatment on quality of life for paralyzed patients with spinal cord injury.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2022 Nov 7;35(2):131-136. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_102_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
9
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation in patients with intrathecal baclofen pump delivery system: A preliminary safety study.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 21;16:1075293. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1075293. eCollection 2022.
10
Trehalose-Carnosine Prevents the Effects of Spinal Cord Injury Through Regulating Acute Inflammation and Zinc(II) Ion Homeostasis.
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023 May;43(4):1637-1659. doi: 10.1007/s10571-022-01273-w. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Spinal Cord. 2017 Oct;55(10):944-949. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.48. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
The analysis of serum lipid levels in patients with spinal cord injury.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Sep;40(5):567-572. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1228286. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
7
Evaluation of quality of life in individuals with severe chronic motor disability: A major challenge.
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016 May;5(2):83-9. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2016.01017.
8
Effect of Spinal Cord Injury on Quality of Life of Affected Soldiers in India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Asian Spine J. 2016 Apr;10(2):267-75. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.267. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Systematic review of the influence of spasticity on quality of life in adults with chronic neurological conditions.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Jul;38(15):1431-1441. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1106592. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
10
Chronic complications of spinal cord injury.
World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):24-33. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验