Kessler Foundation, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, West Orange, New Jersey, USA.
Kessler Foundation, Neuropsychology & Neuroscience Research, West Orange, New Jersey, USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Jan;43(1):88-97. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1543103. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
Cognitive deficits can impact as many as 60% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). In an effort to identify the nature of cognitive deficits in SCI, we examined neuropsychological test performance in individuals with SCI, age matched healthy controls and older healthy controls. Participants completed a motor-free neuropsychological test battery assessing attention, working memory, information processing speed, new learning /memory and executive control. Outpatient rehabilitation research facility. Participants included 60 individuals with chronic spinal cord injury [SCI; 32 with paraplegia (T2-T12) and 28 with tetraplegia (C3-T1)], 30 age-matched healthy controls (AMHC; 30-40 years old) and 20 older healthy controls (OHC; 50-60 years old). Wechsler Intelligence Scale - 3 edition (WAIS-III) Digit Span and Letter-Number Sequencing; Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - oral version; California Verbal Learning Test-II; Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT); Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI); Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System; Verbal Fluency subtest. Significant differences were noted between the SCI and AMHC groups on measures of information processing speed, new learning and memory, and verbal fluency. No significant differences were noted between the groups on tests of attention or working memory. The current study documented differences in specific realms of cognitive functioning between a chronic SCI sample and AMHC. Implications for cognitive rehabilitation and overall quality of life are discussed. Additional research is needed utilizing a more comprehensive battery of motor-free neuropsychological tests that avoid the confound of upper limb motor limitations on cognitive performance.
认知缺陷可能影响多达 60%的脊髓损伤 (SCI) 患者。为了确定 SCI 患者认知缺陷的性质,我们检查了 SCI 患者、年龄匹配的健康对照组和老年健康对照组的神经心理学测试表现。参与者完成了一项无运动神经心理学测试组合,评估注意力、工作记忆、信息处理速度、新学习/记忆和执行控制。门诊康复研究机构。参与者包括 60 名慢性脊髓损伤患者[SCI;32 名截瘫(T2-T12)和 28 名四肢瘫痪(C3-T1)]、30 名年龄匹配的健康对照组(AMHC;30-40 岁)和 20 名老年健康对照组(OHC;50-60 岁)。韦氏智力测验 - 3 版(WAIS-III)数字跨度和字母数字序列;符号数字模态测试(SDMT)- 口语版;加利福尼亚言语学习测验-II;Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT);韦氏简明智力量表(WASI);Delis-Kaplan 执行功能系统;言语流畅性子测验。在信息处理速度、新学习和记忆以及言语流畅性方面,SCI 和 AMHC 组之间存在显著差异。在注意力或工作记忆测试中,两组之间没有显著差异。本研究记录了慢性 SCI 样本和 AMHC 之间特定认知功能领域的差异。讨论了认知康复和整体生活质量的影响。需要进行更多的研究,使用更全面的无运动神经心理学测试组合,避免上肢运动限制对认知表现的混淆。