• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌的微创与开放胃切除术:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案

Minimally invasive and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xixiong, Li Zhiqiang, Chen Meizhu, Wu Chenming, Fu Yexiang

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Boao Evergrande International Hospital, Qionghai.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13419. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013419.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000013419
PMID:30508949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to find the better treatment for gastric cancer by comparing robotic gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and open gastrectomy using Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We will search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies published before 1 September 2018. There will be no language restrictions. Randomized clinical trials that compare robotic gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, or open gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer will be included. The risk of bias of included studies will be assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trial. The outcomes of the study include operation time, estimated blood loss, time of ambulation, times to first flatus, time of oral intake, hospitalization, and the occurrence of complication. If sufficient data is collected and adequate clinical homogeneity is established among studies, we will conduct pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses for all related outcome measures.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study does not involve human subjects and does not need ethical approval and patient consent. The results of the network meta-analysis will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较机器人胃癌切除术、腹腔镜胃癌切除术和开放胃癌切除术,寻找更好的胃癌治疗方法。

方法

我们将检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找2018年9月1日前发表的符合条件的研究。无语言限制。纳入比较机器人胃癌切除术、腹腔镜胃癌切除术或开放胃癌切除术治疗胃癌患者的随机临床试验。纳入研究的偏倚风险将通过Cochrane协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具进行评估。研究结果包括手术时间、估计失血量、下床活动时间、首次排气时间、进食时间、住院时间和并发症的发生情况。如果收集到足够的数据且研究间建立了充分的临床同质性,我们将对所有相关结局指标进行成对荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

伦理与传播

本研究不涉及人类受试者,无需伦理批准和患者同意。网络荟萃分析的结果将在同行评审期刊上发表。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.胃癌的微创与开放胃切除术:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13419. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013419.
2
Short-term outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助治疗后机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌的短期疗效:系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14395-3.
3
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011389.pub2.
4
Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I and II reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜远端胃切除术行毕罗Ⅰ式和Ⅱ式重建的系统评价与Meta分析
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02193-1.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜与开放胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Jun;55(2):652-661. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01048-0. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for resected gastric cancer.一项关于切除胃癌辅助化疗方案的系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14478. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014478.
7
Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic distal gastrectomy for early and locally advanced gastric cancer.系统评价和更新的随机对照试验网络荟萃分析比较了开放性、腹腔镜辅助和机器人辅助远端胃切除术治疗早期和局部进展期胃癌。
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):942-951. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.胃肠道间质瘤的开放性和微创手术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e050414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414.
9
Efficacy of fast track surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.加速康复外科在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Feb;50:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
10
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 2495 patients.机器人手术与腹腔镜胃癌切除术短期临床结局的比较:2495例患者的荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):965-76. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0279. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 29 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数,1990 年至 2016 年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
2
Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人胃癌根治术与腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4244-4251. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5891-4. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
3
Robot-assisted laparoscopic open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜开放胃癌切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;8(3):273-284. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.273.
4
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.腹腔镜及机器人辅助胃癌切除术:当前考量因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5694-717. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5694.
5
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open radical gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜辅助与开放根治性胃切除术治疗可切除胃癌:随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(7):756-67. doi: 10.1002/jso.24243. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
6
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of first-generation and newer-generation antidepressant medications for depressive disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.第一代和新一代抗抑郁药物治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症的疗效及耐受性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 9;5(9):e007768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007768.
7
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胃癌切除术的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2795-802. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3547-1. Epub 2014 May 2.
10
Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人与开腹胃癌手术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 3;8(12):e81946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081946. eCollection 2013.