1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):382-385. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20060. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
The purpose of this study is to determine both the frequency of repeat CT performed within 1 month after a patient visits the emergency department (ED) and undergoes CT evaluation for abdominal pain and the frequency of worsened or new CT-based diagnoses.
Secondary analysis was performed on data collected during a prospective multicenter study. The parent study included patients who underwent CT in the ED for abdominal pain between 2012 and 2014, and these patients constituted the study group of the present analysis. The proportion of patients who underwent (in any setting) repeat abdominal CT within 1 month of the index CT examination was calculated. For each of these patients, results of the index and repeat CT scans were compared by an independent panel and categorized as follows: no change (group 1); same process, improved (group 2); same process, worse (group 3); or different process (group 4). The proportion of patients in groups 1 and 2 versus groups 3 and 4 was calculated, and patient and ED physician characteristics were compared.
The parent study included 544 patients (246 of whom were men [45%]; mean patient age, 49.4 years). Of those 544 patients, 53 (10%; 95% CI, 7.5-13%) underwent repeat abdominal CT. Patients' CT comparisons were categorized as follows: group 1 for 43% of patients (23/53), group 2 for 26% (14/53), group 3 for 15% (8/53), and group 4 for 15% (8/53). New or worse findings were present in 30% of patients (16/53) (95% CI, 19-44%). When patients with findings in groups 1 and 2 were compared to patients with findings in groups 3 and 4, no significant difference was noted in patient age (p = 0.25) or sex (p = 0.76), the number of days between scans (p = 0.98), and the diagnostic confidence of the ED physician after the index CT scan was obtained (p = 0.33).
Short-term, repeat abdominal CT was performed for 10% of patients who underwent CT in the ED for abdominal pain, and it yielded new or worse findings for 30% of those patients.
本研究旨在确定患者在急诊科(ED)就诊并接受腹部 CT 检查后 1 个月内行重复 CT 的频率,以及新出现或恶化的基于 CT 的诊断的频率。
对 2012 年至 2014 年间在 ED 行 CT 检查的腹痛患者进行前瞻性多中心研究的数据进行二次分析。该研究组为本分析的研究组。计算了(在任何环境下)在索引 CT 检查后 1 个月内行重复腹部 CT 的患者比例。对于每位患者,独立小组比较了索引和重复 CT 扫描的结果,并分为以下几类:无变化(第 1 组);相同过程,改善(第 2 组);相同过程,恶化(第 3 组);或不同过程(第 4 组)。计算第 1 组和第 2 组与第 3 组和第 4 组患者的比例,并比较患者和 ED 医师的特征。
该母研究共纳入 544 例患者(246 例男性[45%];平均患者年龄为 49.4 岁)。544 例患者中有 53 例(10%;95%CI,7.5-13%)行重复腹部 CT。患者的 CT 比较结果如下:第 1 组占 43%(53 例中的 23 例),第 2 组占 26%(53 例中的 14 例),第 3 组占 15%(53 例中的 8 例),第 4 组占 15%(53 例中的 8 例)。30%的患者(53 例中的 16 例)有新的或更差的发现(95%CI,19-44%)。比较第 1 组和第 2 组患者与第 3 组和第 4 组患者时,患者年龄(p = 0.25)或性别(p = 0.76)、扫描间隔天数(p = 0.98)以及 ED 医师在获取索引 CT 扫描后对诊断的信心(p = 0.33)均无显著差异。
因腹痛在 ED 行 CT 的患者中有 10%行短期重复腹部 CT,其中 30%的患者有新的或更差的发现。