Wyant Kara J, Yasuda Erika, Kotagal Vikas
Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI.
Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System (VAAAHS) & VAAAHS Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Ann Arbor Michigan.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Oct 4;5(5):512-518. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12665. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
We know little about how well the goals and results of clinical trials in Parkinson disease (PD) reflect the priorities of patients and the broader PD community.
We conducted a review of registered trials on http://clincialtrials.gov from 2007 to 2016 to explore whether PD trials have moved closer to the therapeutic priority goals articulated by the PD community.
Using the search terms: Parkinson, interventional trials, phase "0-4," we categorized therapeutic PD studies from http://clinicaltrials.gov between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016. Seven hundred and sixty-six trials met the criteria for analysis. We explored temporal trends in the utilization of balance problems and falls; mood symptoms, including stress and anxiety; cognitive dysfunction, including dementia; and dyskinesias as primary outcomes. We analyzed trials where recruitment was listed as "completed" (n = 391) to explore publication rates.
Balance problems and falls were listed as primary outcome measures in 125 studies (16.3%), cognitive measures in 48 (6.3%), mood features in 37 (4.8%), and dyskinesias in 30 (3.9%). Trials using balance problems and falls as a primary outcome increased in frequency per year between 2007 and 2016 (Z = -2.128, = 0.033) unlike the proportion of trials evaluating cognitive dysfunction including dementia (Z = -0.380, = 0.704), mood symptoms including stress and anxiety (Z = 0.345, = 0.730), or dyskinesias (Z = 0.340, = 0.734), which did not show temporal changes. 231 (59.1%) completed trials had results published in manuscript form as of 5/1/2017, leaving 40.9% of trials unpublished.
PD trials focusing on balance problems and falls are becoming more common. About 40% of completed PD trials are unpublished, reflecting suboptimal utilization of participant efforts.
我们对帕金森病(PD)临床试验的目标和结果在多大程度上反映患者及更广泛的PD群体的优先事项了解甚少。
我们对2007年至2016年在http://clincialtrials.gov上注册的试验进行了综述,以探讨PD试验是否更接近PD群体所阐明的治疗优先目标。
使用搜索词:帕金森病、干预性试验、“0 - 4期”,我们对2007年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间来自http://clinicaltrials.gov的治疗性PD研究进行了分类。766项试验符合分析标准。我们探讨了将平衡问题和跌倒、情绪症状(包括压力和焦虑)、认知功能障碍(包括痴呆)以及异动症作为主要结局的使用的时间趋势。我们分析了招募状态列为“已完成”的试验(n = 391)以探讨发表率。
125项研究(16.3%)将平衡问题和跌倒列为主要结局指标,48项(6.3%)将认知指标列为主要结局指标,37项(4.8%)将情绪特征列为主要结局指标,30项(3.9%)将异动症列为主要结局指标。与评估包括痴呆在内的认知功能障碍(Z = -0.380,P = 0.704)、包括压力和焦虑在内的情绪症状(Z = 0.345,P = 0.730)或异动症(Z = 0.340,P = 0.734)的试验比例不同,2007年至2016年期间,将平衡问题和跌倒作为主要结局的试验每年频率增加(Z = -2.128,P = 0.033),这些指标未显示出时间变化。截至2017年5月1日,231项(59.1%)已完成的试验有以手稿形式发表的结果,40.9%的试验未发表。
关注平衡问题和跌倒的PD试验越来越普遍。约40%已完成的PD试验未发表,这反映了对参与者努力的利用欠佳。