Centre for Environment and Health (Ms Goorts, Dr Vandenbroeck, Dr Du Bois, Dr Godderis); Idewe, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work (Dr Vandenbroeck, Dr Vander Elst, Dr Godderis); Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (Dr Vander Elst), University of Leuven, Leuven; Département des Sciences de la Santé publique, Ecole de santé publique, Université de Liège (Dr Rusu); and SPMT-ARISTA, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work (Dr Rusu), Liège, Belgium.
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Feb;61(2):e43-e50. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001512.
Increasing long-term sickness absence in many countries asks for specific measures regarding return-to work.
The risk of long-term sickness absence was assessed using a questionnaire containing work-related, function-related, stressful life-events-related, and person-related factors. Additionally, workers' occupational health physician estimated the worker's chances for work resumption. Reliability, construct, and criterion validity of the questionnaire were measured.
Two hundred seventy-six patients and 35 physicians participated in the study. The reliability was satisfying (α > 0.70) for all scales, except for perfectionism (α = 0.62). The results of the CFAs showed that the hypothesized factor models fitted the data well. Criterion validity tests showed that eight predictors significantly related to the estimation of the occupational physicians (ρ < 0.05).
The scales of the questionnaire are reliable and valid, and may be implemented to assess sick-listed workers at risk who might benefit from a rehabilitation program.
许多国家长期病假的增加要求针对重返工作岗位采取具体措施。
使用包含与工作相关、与功能相关、与压力生活事件相关和与个人相关的因素的问卷评估长期病假的风险。此外，工人的职业健康医生估计工人恢复工作的可能性。该问卷的可靠性、构建和标准有效性进行了测量。
本研究共有 276 名患者和 35 名医生参与。除完美主义（α=0.62）外，所有量表的可靠性均令人满意（α>0.70）。结构方程模型的结果表明，假设的因素模型很好地拟合了数据。标准有效性检验表明，有八个预测因子与职业医生的评估显著相关（ρ<0.05）。
问卷的量表具有可靠性和有效性，可用于评估可能受益于康复计划的有风险的病假工人。
