• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测成年智障者精神障碍的PAS-ADD检查表的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.

作者信息

Moss S, Prosser H, Costello H, Simpson N, Patel P, Rowe S, Turner S, Hatton C

机构信息

Hester Adrian Research Centre, University of Manchester, England.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998 Apr;42 ( Pt 2):173-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x
PMID:9617701
Abstract

The PAS-ADD Checklist is a screening instrument specifically designed to help staff recognize mental health problems in the people with intellectual disability for whom they care, and to make informed referral decisions. The instrument consists of a life-events checklist and 29 symptom items scored on a four-point scale. Scores are combined to provide three threshold scores. The crossing of any of these thresholds indicates the need for a fuller assessment. The items are worded in everyday language, making the Checklist suitable for use by individuals who do not have a background in psychopathology. The present paper presents the results of a number of studies evaluating the reliability and validity of the Checklist. Factor analysis of Checklists completed on a community sample of 201 individuals yielded eight factors, of which seven were readily interpretable in diagnostic terms. Internal consistency of the scales was generally acceptable. Inter-rater reliability in respect to individual items gave a fairly low average Kappa of 0.42. However, agreement on case identification, the main purpose of the Checklist, was quite good, with 83% of the decision being in agreement. Validity in relation to clinical opinion was also satisfactory, case detection rising appropriately with the clinically judged severity of disorder. The PAS-ADD Checklist is published and distributed by the Hester Adrian Research Centre, Manchester, England, from where further information and order forms are available on request.

摘要

PAS-ADD检查表是一种筛查工具,专门设计用于帮助工作人员识别他们所照顾的智障人士的心理健康问题,并做出明智的转诊决定。该工具包括一个生活事件检查表和29个症状项目,按四点量表评分。分数合并后提供三个阈值分数。任何一个阈值的突破都表明需要进行更全面的评估。这些项目用日常语言表述,使检查表适合没有精神病理学背景的人使用。本文介绍了多项评估该检查表信度和效度的研究结果。对201名社区样本完成的检查表进行因子分析,得出八个因子,其中七个在诊断方面易于解释。量表的内部一致性总体上可以接受。各项目的评分者间信度给出的平均卡帕值相当低,为0.42。然而,在检查表的主要目的即病例识别方面,一致性相当好,83%的决定意见一致。与临床意见相关的效度也令人满意,病例检出率随临床判断的疾病严重程度适当上升。PAS-ADD检查表由英国曼彻斯特的海丝特·阿德里安研究中心出版和发行,可根据要求从该中心获取更多信息和订购表格。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.用于检测成年智障者精神障碍的PAS-ADD检查表的信度和效度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998 Apr;42 ( Pt 2):173-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x.
2
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
3
Reliability and validity of the Mini PAS-ADD for assessing psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.用于评估成年智力残疾者精神障碍的简易PAS-ADD的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998 Aug;42 ( Pt 4):264-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00146.x.
4
Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability: a structured psychiatric interview for intellectual disability.《发育障碍成人精神科评估量表》西班牙语版的可行性、信度和效度:一份针对智力残疾的结构化精神科访谈
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002 Mar;46(Pt 3):209-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00402.x.
5
Spanish validation of the PAS-ADD Checklist Questionnaire for people with intellectual disabilities for Spanish population.西班牙验证 PAS-ADD 清单问卷用于智力残疾人群的西班牙人群。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Oct;61(10):909-915. doi: 10.1111/jir.12393. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
Psychometric evaluation of a Dutch version of the Mini PAS-ADD for assessing psychiatric disorders in adults with different levels of intellectual disability.荷兰版Mini PAS-ADD用于评估不同智力残疾水平成人精神疾病的心理测量学评价。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):689-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01544.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
7
Validity of the PAS-ADD for detecting psychiatric symptoms in adults with learning disability (mental retardation).用于检测有学习障碍(智力迟钝)的成年人精神症状的PAS-ADD的效度。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;32(6):344-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00805440.
8
The Adolescent Behavior Checklist: normative data and sensitivity and specificity of a screening tool for diagnosable psychiatric disorders in adolescents with mental retardation and other development disabilities.青少年行为检查表:针对智力障碍及其他发育障碍青少年可诊断精神疾病筛查工具的常模数据、敏感性和特异性
Res Dev Disabil. 1994 Mar-Apr;15(2):151-65. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90019-1.
9
Reliability and validity of the SPAID-G checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.精神病理学评估工具-成人版(SPAID-G)清单检测成年智力障碍者精神障碍的信度和效度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
10
The PAS-ADD Checklist: independent replication of its psychometric properties in a community sample.PAS-ADD检查表:在社区样本中对其心理测量特性进行独立复制研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;186:319-23. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.4.319.

引用本文的文献

1
A multivariate analysis of the impact of knowledge and relationships on perceptions about aging among generation Z-a starting point for public health strategies.关于知识和人际关系对Z世代衰老观念影响的多变量分析——公共卫生策略的起点
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 12;13:1522078. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1522078. eCollection 2025.
2
Dravet syndrome: From neurodevelopmental to neurodegenerative disease?德雷维特综合征:从神经发育性疾病转变为神经退行性疾病?
Epilepsia. 2025 Jun;66(6):1975-1987. doi: 10.1111/epi.18329. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
3
Outcome Measures in intellectual disability: A Review and narrative synthesis of validated instruments.
智力残疾的结局测量:已验证工具的综述与叙述性综合分析
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;71(2):239-253. doi: 10.1177/00207640241291517. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Integrative Care for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities to Reduce Challenging Behaviors and Inappropriate Psychotropic Drug Prescribing Compared with Care as Usual: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.与常规护理相比,针对智障人士具有挑战性的行为进行综合护理以减少具有挑战性的行为和不适当的精神药物处方:一项集群随机试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 20;21(7):950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070950.
5
Developing and Implementing a Web-Based Branching Logic Survey to Support Psychiatric Crisis Evaluations of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: Qualitative Study and Evaluation of Validity.开发和实施基于网络的分支逻辑调查,以支持对发育障碍个体的精神科危机评估:定性研究和有效性评估。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Mar 29;11:e50907. doi: 10.2196/50907.
6
Health support of people with intellectual disability and the crucial role of support workers.智障人士的健康支持及支持工作者的关键作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10206-2.
7
An investigation into the critical ingredients of intensive support teams for adults with intellectual disabilities who display challenging behaviour.对为表现出挑战性行为的成年智障人士提供强化支持的团队的关键要素进行的调查。
BJPsych Bull. 2023 Dec 11;49(1):1-6. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.94.
8
Evaluation of a novel, multicomponent anxiety management programme for people with intellectual disability: protocol for a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental feasibility study.一种新型的、多成分的焦虑管理方案用于智力障碍患者的评估:一项混合方法、准实验可行性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e078411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078411.
9
Consumption of Genetically Modified Food Products and Its Determinants (Case Study: Edible Oil in Mashhad).转基因食品的消费及其决定因素(案例研究:马什哈德的食用油)
Foods. 2023 Aug 2;12(15):2933. doi: 10.3390/foods12152933.
10
Politics or markets: The dual role of the motivation to achieve organizational legitimacy in the development of knowledge management capabilities and business model innovation.政治还是市场:在知识管理能力发展和商业模式创新中实现组织合法性动机的双重作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1112240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112240. eCollection 2023.